News media in Chicago are reporting that all is not smooth sailing for the enactment of legislation that would overhaul rules for exhibitors at McCormick Place.
The Chicago Tribune, ABC News, and CBS News now say that Illinois Governor Pat Quinn will not necessarily sign the bill, at least not in its present form. The bill, passed two weeks ago by the Illinois House and Senate, contains a “bill of rights” aimed at reducing costs for the Graphic Arts Show Company (GASC) and other groups that produce trade shows at the lakeside expo facility.
The main sticking point appears to be Governor Quinn’s unhappiness over the role that would be played by Jim Reilly, a consultant who advised the legislature about conditions at McCormick Place as the bill was being drafted.
The bill names Reilly as the trustee who would oversee the facility, and this, according to the news stories, is seen by the governor as a potential conflict of interest. Reilly has been a consultant to Freeman and GES, the facility’s exhibition contractors. He also is a former executive in charge of McCormick Place, the home of the Print and Graph Expo shows. (This blog at Crain’s Chicago Business describes the situation in detail.)
Also said to be a factor is pressure on Governor Quinn by the facility’s labor unions, whose practices during shows would be sharply modified or curtailed by the legislation.
The stories quote the governor as saying that he will not move to sign the bill into law until he has had more time to scrutinize its details.
GASC and four other show-producing organizations lobbied hard for the bill, telling lawmakers that Chicago faced the loss of their trade show business if they could not get relief from the high costs and restrictive work rules that have prevailed for many years at McCormick Place.
The article in The Chicago Tribune says that the governor’s “discomfort in signing off is ratcheting up anxiety among trade show organizers.”
It also quotes Chris Price, vice president of GASC, as predicting, “The more time that elapses before a signature, the more chunks of business...will go away."
Ralph Nappi, president of GASC, discussed the show company’s stance on reforms at McCormick Place in an interview with WhatTheyThink. What exhibiting there will be like when and if the reforms are implemented is addressed in this video by the Chicago Convention & Tourism Bureau.
Discussion
By Tman on May 17, 2010
Why would anybody in their right mind put a person that worked for the people he would be policing in charge. He also generated the same group (Focus)that overcharges for the electrical services,that everyone is up in arms about. What is our legislature thinking?
By printforever on May 19, 2010
I think that it is time for GraphExpo to move it's venue and see about a more competitively priced exhibition location. I have seen a huge amount of trade shows move to Vegas.
By Chuck on May 19, 2010
Typical. And disgusting.
By Eric on May 19, 2010
While I love visiting the city of Chicago every year for the GASC show as an exhibitor this is the exact reason why we cut our booth space in half this year. Even with the new rules I don't see things progressing well because the unions will be so angry that they will just drag out the amount of time it takes to complete their tasks. It's time to move the show to a more convention friendly city or get rid of the annual show all together.
By Jonelle on May 19, 2010
Chicago is a great city because it's centrally located. I have to agree with Tman and Eric's comments, but I sincerely hope the city of Philadelphia is never considered. If you think Chicago is bad, Philadelphia is noticably worse.
By Lithoman on May 20, 2010
The unions have not weighed in yet.
By Patrick Henry on May 21, 2010
What hasn't been mentioned is the fact that the Chicago area contains the nation's largest concentration of printing companies—printing companies that account for the bulk of attendance at Graph Expo and Print. Attendance, as far as exhibitors are concerned, is everything. And while Orlando and Las Vegas might be cheaper as venues than Chicago, they'd also be thinner in terms of local participation. That makes them poor choices for the GASC shows.
By Bob Neubauer on May 21, 2010
After a meeting yesterday, things look more hopeful. Did you see today's Trib:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0521-trade-show-20100521,0,1450899.story
Discussion
Only verified members can comment.