With the release of PANTONE PLUS, Pantone has taken an important step to modernize the PANTONE MATCHING SYSTEM (PMS), which has been a color communication standard for half a century. When Pantone introduced the Goe system in 2007, many wondered whether this was an attempt to replace PMS. According to Ron Potesky, that was not the case, and Goe is still a viable product. However, adoption has been slower than the company might have expected. Potesky told WhatTheyThink, “Goe is a great product. It is chromatically designed, has more than 2,000 colors and uses a standard ink film thickness that allows for repeatability. But it has not been well understood in the creative market. Goe will continue as part of our strategy moving forward and has a place in the system for certain types of jobs, including packaging and jobs with acqueous or UV coating. But PMS has been and will continue to be the lead core product. It owns brand colors for so many companies and designers, and we don’t want to change that. It will remain our flagship product globally.”
But Pantone has taken some of the attributes and learnings and applied those to the revamped PMS system, including new colors (224 new solid colors) printed at uniform ink film thickness on the guides, more colors and a chromatic arrangement. Pantone has also released new digital tools including iPhone/iPad apps and more. While none of the existing formulations or numbers have been changed nor have any colors been removed, the arrangement is different and the system includes an index to help uses find specific colors. Potesky also pointed out that all books and guides will be printed on FSC certified text-weight stocks with bio-friendly ISO certified inks. One of those cool tools is the ColorChecker lighting indicator, which will be in all of the guides. The two patches of color will match in D50 daylight conditions but will look different in bad lighting. This makes me think of all the times we had to take paint chips outside at Home Depot to see what they really look like. The system will also have 42 new neon colors, which Potesky says meets a growing trend. Although there is a minor price increase, Pantone has attempted to keep pricing in line with the old system to encourage designers and others to purchase the upgraded system and take advantage of the new capabilities.
This is a smart move on the part of Pantone and should find good reception as the company makes its announcement during the opening days of IPEX
Discussion
By John Henry on May 10, 2010
New coke/old coke. Same issues, Pantone did not enough research of printers or designers, they moved ahead with Goe. Major firms and even minor ones have years of identity tied to their PMS branded logo.
I am glad they saw the writing on the wall. I think in 5 years only us old printers will recall Goe.
I can say without a second’s hesitation I will get the new updated guide and am sure I will see the new colors being used by my customers. I never felt that way about Goe.
By Henk Gianotten on May 10, 2010
You mentioned that the inks for the CMYK Bridge are ISO certified. I assume ISO 2846-1. How about the printing? Are there any ISO 12647-2 standards and G7 process control tools used to print this stuff?
If ISO 12647-2 is the aim value, no Euro versions are needed anymore.
By tmason on May 11, 2010
How about they figure out that uncoated formulas are different than coated and make sure the press can carry the same film weight (with water)as what is printed in the PMS book.
With all of the "green" movement, why do we still print PMS colors instead of all process. Process inks are cheaper, can be made with less raw materials, and can be made "Zero" VOC.
This would also use less solvents to wash up multiple colors per shift.
By Eddy Hagen (VIGC) on May 13, 2010
I've only taken a brief look at the new system but to me it seems that Pantone did a better job than in the past (I have been a little picky on Pantone in the past, e.g. at the launch of Goe and the launch of the iPhone app as you may remember).
The color bridge books are printed according to ISO 12647 and G7, which is good.
The color manager software will be able to show you the right cmyk values according to *your* ICC profile. So conversions to cmyk should be much more reliable than in the past. (I wonder whether this will work with multichannel profiles)
What I really appreciate: the ColorChecker lighting indicator... This is really essential to color perception: different light sources give different colors (metamerism!), but too little people are aware of that, too little people take that into account. With lots of discussions as a result.
What I don't like: when looking at the pictures of the guides, values are stated in RGB... without explicitely stating sRGB (once again!). In the rest of the documentation it is always stated that it is sRGB, but they should print this also on the guides themselves. People don't read documentation...
But, like I already said, it's certainly an improvement and certainly has the potential to reduce the number of discussions on the appearance of spot colors, the amount of money lost to bad spot color specifications, to bad spot color expectations.
By Henk Gianotten on Jun 29, 2010
@eddy,
Did you measure the CMYK colors in the Bridge Plus?
The major changes of Plus are: more colors and for a lot of colors, differences in CMYK percentages. The differences between PMS 2003 and PMS Plus are substantial. The differences between PMS Euro and PMS Plus are far less. The Euro guides differed less from our actual print standards.
Discussion
Only verified members can comment.