Remember a day, a day before today, a time when user groups roamed the land, basking in the warm valleys and gazing into what could have been a bright future? In the various regional editions of Micro Publishing News magazine back in the mid to late 1990s, we used to be able to fill entire tabloid-size pages with news of user group meetings and events.
Over the years, membership in many user groups has waned, often to the point of non-existence, and many have vanished. In some cases, this was understandable; but in others, it’s hard not to get the sense that something very real has been lost.
I never really thought about this much until lunch today at the Graphic Users Association (GUA) conference here in Vancouver. For those keeping score, this used to be the Creo Users Group, and was renamed after Creo was acquired by Kodak. Attendance here is—I would guess—about 200. The most common theme of why people attend user group conferences? “The product managers are here and I can corner them,” is the most frequent response—often expressed that way verbatim. Printers who have problems or questions about their products can easily get help, not only from the people who made the products in the first place, but also from other users. In one session, a presenter was unable to answer a fairly wonky question, but other audience members chimed in with answers. At lunch, users of Kodak products conferred, comparing and contrasting their experiences. They all decided that life would be easier without print buyers. (Yes, well, be careful what you wish for...) Business cards were frequently exchanged. Friendships were likely forged and, who knows, maybe even a love connection or two. Well, okay, maybe not....
Because I am a trouble-maker and a rabble rouser, I occasionally roused the rabble by asking about the extent to which attendees take the interactive user group experience online—that is, to social media. Do they find online resources useful? And, truth be told, few seemed all that sanguine about it. Granted, this is a fairly self-selected sample; if you take the time and expense to travel some distance to a user group conference, chances are you find more value in it than staying at the office and tweeting or LinkedInning.
It’s tempting to think, “Oh, those Luddites. They’ll avoid anything online.” But, you know, that’s not it at all. The general feeling is that, when it comes to getting answers to highly technical questions, it’s just easier and more effective in person. That is, often it takes some degree of effort to even figure out what the asker is asking, and that kind of investigative probing is a lot more difficult in the context of a 140-character tweet or even a LinkedIn Answers question. This also especially the case when so many of our industry terms can have different meanings. Anyone who has used an online tech support site that similarly forces you to explain a problem in a very limited number of characters has also felt this frustration.
This is not to say that “Twitter is bad!” (I have enough followees that are increasingly convincing me of that) or that “You should go to every user group event you can!” Rather it’s just that each medium has its place in the overall mix, and that every medium has its advantages and disadvantages, and that this is why we ignore any one of the slices of the media pie at our peril. And user groups are yet another one of those slices, and often a very tasty one at that.
Discussion
By Chuck on Apr 13, 2010
This thing has apparently failed. It wasn't all that great to begin with, and now it's all but dead. And the reason is not that people have other sources of obtaining the same benefits-- it's because the group and the event is poorly run. That is also why EFI's Connect is shrinking.
Compare this group to DSCOOP (the independent HP user group), and it's like night and day. DSCOOP has strong Print Service Provider board leadership and amazing professional association management. Isn't it fantastic that DSCOOP went from 0 to almost 2,000 attendees in 5 years? Because it is more than nice to put faces to names in person, and network with the technical people who you normally only know online and on the phone.
Over ninety vendors showed up at DSCOOP5 in addition to HP, by the way, so it's not just HP's largesse that's paying the freight. DSCOOP also has a thriving online community at DSCOOP.ORG and on the social networks like LinkedIn.
Wow! This GUA group went from a peak of about 350 down to 200-- that takes skill!
By Frank on Apr 14, 2010
Connect is not shrinking at all. This year they increased the amount of participants significantly. It is a well run event that I can only recommend to attend.
By Noel Ward on Apr 15, 2010
Chuck, to be fair, the print industry has also contracted. And the economy probably also plays a part in how many people can spring for the trip to Vancouver. I don't know the year-over-year numbers, but my sense was that GUA attendance was similar to last year.
GUA also plays to a far narrower audience than Dscoop, and the organizations operate quite differently. There's no doubt that Dscoop is the best of all user associations in this industry. I've been to three of them and they keep getting better.
I was at GUA, too, and the attendees I talked with liked two things (other than a chance to get out of the office). First, the access to the product guys from Kodak and second, the ability to network with peers.
The latter is at the core of most user associations and is the real value, as long as the connections made are maintained beyond the conference. This is certainly the case with Dscoop and the Imaging Network Group, as I've pointed out in my blog on Graphic Arts Online. And wasn't the user-to-user connection the idea behind "user groups" to begin with?
By Michael j on Apr 15, 2010
I don't know how it plays out, but it's probably worth considering that Kodak moved alot of the super geeks to Isreal.
By Chuck on Apr 15, 2010
Noel, if only this were true. It's kind of funny, but when I read Richard's first post the you, he, Lisa Cross (Graphic Arts Monthly), Justin Searles (InfoTrends), and Mark Michelson (Printing Impressions) were all there, I said to myself, "why on earth are they wasting their time at that waste of time!" It's kind of like, HP is investing in their future and so are their customers, and Kodak's GA biz is cost-cutting and de-strategizing themselves into oblivion. Except for Jeff Hayzlett, I'm a huge fan of his and he's doing amazing things-- and I can see from his LinkedIn and Twitter posts that HE didn't choose to waste his time at this event? What does that say? I don't mean to be negative, but things are changing so rapidly, this is an example of something that isn't keeping up with the times.
By Michael j on Apr 15, 2010
Chuck,
Just wanted to put my $.02 in on Kodak. I mostly agree with "Kodak’s GA biz is cost-cutting and de-strategizing themselves into oblivion."
In fact the share price had been hovering around $4 while Xerox was steadily moving up. But,
in the last couple of weeks, the stock took a big jump on a bunch of volume. Up about 14% in one day. I have no idea why, but here's what I'm thinking.
The Prosper is finally in the field. Consolidated has one in the States. I bet it will be a big deal at Ipex. From what I understand the TOC of the Prosper digital web is game changing low.
The other thing that keeps rolling around my mind is that the CREO dna in Kodak is a huge value. I don't know where it's going to land, but it's quite a jewel.
The other thing isz that KKR is a major player at Kodak. They got a significant piece at the end of last year.
Meanwhile, I think I read that KM got frozen out when Cannon bought Oce. To be clear, I'm just making this stuff up with NO real knowledge. But.. I wouldn't be all that surprised if some unexpected thing comes from Kodak's direction before IPEX.
My bet is the photo web business goes one way. The print business goes another.
By Chuck on Apr 15, 2010
Michael, I can't argue with any of that, very astute, a lot of validity. I haven't watched the videos yet from GUA, I wonder if they talked about any of those cool technologies or alliances/deals? Sorry, now I'm getting way too snarky. I've already said more than I should on this topic.
By Michael j on Apr 16, 2010
Chuck,
FYI I luv snarky. In my opinion, we need a lot more snarky to get some real ideas on the table so we can help Printers figure out how to get from here to there. You should see how snarky I can get on Twitter.
The more serious point is that one thing that makes any exchange of ideas useful is to be able to speak in an authentic voice.
Given that we both have spent years in the trenches in pressrooms I bet we can both speak authentic print. My fav line has always been, "Fu*k'em if they can't take a joke."
By Michael j on Apr 17, 2010
Chuck,
I found this article at Seeking Alpha re Kodak.
http://ilnk.me/241d
The money sentence:
Q: What is your highest conviction stock position in your fund - long or short?
A: Our pick is Eastman Kodak (EK). We bought the stock in the beginning of January 2010 at $4.31.
Closed yesterday at $7.39.
Full disclosure: Long EK.