“Adobe Systems helped to build the modern printing industry and now, it appears, they are hellbent on destroying it—not by willful action, but by neglect.” (Frank Romano) "We are not turning our back on printers; we continue to be committed to the print segment and it is really important that people don’t think Adobe doesn’t care about the industry. We do.” (Lynly Schambers-Lenox, Senior Product Marketing Manager for Print Service Provider Program at Adobe) Do you think that your small printing business could be hurt, directly or indirectly, by Adobe Systems Inc.’s decision to retire the Adobe Partner Connection Print Service Provider Program? In case you’re not familiar with this development and its implications for users of Adobe graphic software, WhatTheyThink has been all over the story since the news broke earlier this month. Senior editor Cary Sherburne made it the subject of a heavily commented thread at PrintCEO and followed this up with a comprehensive analysis of Adobe’s move in WhatTheyThink’s news section last week. Frank Romano has weighed in with a no-holds-barred opinion piece of his own, and a lively discussion of the situation is in progress over at PrintPlanet. There’s much to talk about. For many years, paid subscribers to the Partner Program could count on continuous software updates and other forms of assistance that let them optimize their use of Creative Suite and related Adobe products. By providing responsive technical support, the program also reinforced Adobe’s ties to the industry that it revolutionized—a favor that the industry returned by steadfastly purchasing Adobe products and serving as the bedrock of the $19 billion operation that Adobe Systems is today. The connection will be reset on February 4, 2010 as Adobe, citing declining participation in the Partner Program, attempts to replace it with another, as-yet-undefined support scheme for Adobe users. The company says that this plan, which seems to involve obtaining support through the regional affiliates of Printing Industries of America, will make former subscribers “happy” even though direct liaison with the source will be lost. WhatTheyThink has reported that Quark Inc., which lost its long-held primacy in desktop publishing after Adobe launched Creative Suite in 2003, hopes to lure unhappy Adobe customers with offers of free copies of QuarkXPress 8 and free enrollment in its own output provider programs. It remains to be seen how printers, who could no more function without Adobe technology than they could without paper or ink, will be affected by the company’s apparent decision to distance itself from their day-to-day operations. The fear, as always, is that the impact will be in inverse proportion to company size. “The people hurt the most are the small quick printers who don’t have the resources or see the need to be a member of Printing Industries of America,” observes Scott Cappel, president of Sorrento Mesa Printing in San Diego, CA, in a quote from Cary’s analysis. Personally, it makes us sad to see any change that even appears to reduce Adobe’s historic identification with graphic communications. Adobe founders John Warnock and Charles Geschke are printing’s Edison and Marconi. With PostScript, they turned the graphic arts into something that made sense to do with computers. Think of how the PostScript Type 1 font format transformed typography. Try to imagine multimedia publishing or electronic document management as they exist today without the emergence of PDF—it can’t be done. If you have something to say about Adobe’s new stance on its relationship with printing, you can be sure that many ears are listening. Please post your comments here, at PrintCEO, or at PrintPlanet—or at all three. CLARIFICATION: The $19 billion figure cited above refers to an estimate of Adobe's market capitalization, not its actual revenue. Adobe has reported that it achieved revenue of $2.946 billion in fiscal year 2009.
Discussion
By Jim Munro on Jan 25, 2010
Though I had not previously participated in the program I was literally hours away from signing up when this happened. It reminds me of the time that they put an email link into their driver to send jobs direct to Kinkos. Adobe has clearly forgotten who got them to this point and small guys like me will indeed suffer the most.
By Dale on Jan 26, 2010
We have twice signed up for the Adobe Print Service Provider Program, when the first CS package was released and again after CS3 was released. Part of our reason for not continuing enrollment was finding that our down line team of designers were either still working with the CS2 or CS3 packages and were not planning to upgrade to CS4. While the value was tremendous, that same $600 could go towards other needed technologies. I'm bummed that Adobe is dropping the program and hope that they will come up with an even more affordable alternative.
By Tom T on Jan 26, 2010
I am somewhat familiar with Adobe's interaction with the print industry. When Adobe pulled the embedded KINKO's link in Acrobat a few years ago I was a member of the coaltion that met with Adobe's CEO Bruce Chizen (since gone). We made it very clear that Adobe's blatant disregard for the printing industry was unacceptable. Adobe admitted it was a mistake teaming up with Kinkos and issued a patch that removed that link. What we expressed then has been forgotten. You see it isn't so much that Adobe helped build the modern print industry, it's that the print industry built Adobe. We made Adobe the vendor of choice and bought thier products and drove their developments. We were/are the market they needed to become the giant corporation they are today. How soon they forget.
By Poor Richard on Jan 27, 2010
We've been off and on members of the Partners program for years. We did not really take advantage of the support, but the upgrades were nice (at least before they came with the stipulation that the software could only be used for output). Adobe's disenchantment with and disinterest in the printing industry became abundantly clear during the Kinko's fiasco. It now seems evident that we are perceived by Adobe as a captive and diminishing market, and I suspect that perception is at least partially accurate. Quark is not really an alternative to InDesign. Our customers don't use it anymore. And what printer could do without .pdf files? That said, many of us are also entering areas where Adobe does have competition. Adobe does not have a lock on web development software. In fact, there are very good open source solutions available for online content creation that do not carry the Adobe label. It seems unfortunate that Adobe is burning bridges when they could be encouraging a mainstay market segment to expand their capabilities with products like Dreamweaver and Flash.
By Michael Jahn on Feb 01, 2010
this comment/snip seems to summarize the amazing disconnect between what Adobe is doing and what the printers seem to think they need to be doing; "It remains to be seen how printers, who could no more function without Adobe technology than they could without paper or ink, will be affected by the company’s apparent decision to distance itself from their day-to-day operations." 1. Paper is a commodity as is ink. Printers buy it from suppliers of paper and ink, and vendors of paper and ink are paid when they use it. 2. PDF files, while they are created and exchanged - are NOT sold by Adobe - Adobe makes TOOLS that they sell, and printers customer buy these tools. I know of many many printers who do not own ANYTHING from Adobe, and never need to. There are many PDF file processors that require nothing from Adobe. 3. Adobe offered help when most of us in the printing vertical didn't realize we needed application specialist and programmers - that time has past! The concept that Adobe is walking away is silly - they were here to help us learn to CRAWL. Hopefully, we all have computer literate customers now, and industry like GWG that help the few that need to know how to make things reliable. 4. PDF is an ISO specification now, no longer managed or really, even marketed by Adobe. It is more akin to the inch or the millimeter. We don't need vendor support to understand inches or millimeters, we just have to adhere to the specification. If a vendors applications did not support inches or millimeters, it would probably fail in our vertical. When things get sideways, it is because some moron does not know better. Adobe can't fix stupid. 3. Adobe is not burning bridges. They are building new ones. The bridge they are building happens to be heading toward the Island of eBook and dynamic content, and most of the whiners here will continue to live in the land of "wait, wait, I can get that content printed and delivered to to in like..." well, that was so 20 seconds ago, sorry, I don't need that... My two Somalia Shillings.
By Pat McGrew on Feb 01, 2010
I have to weigh in on that same line Michael focused on: "It remains to be seen how printers, who could no more function without Adobe technology than they could without paper or ink, will be affected by the company’s apparent decision to distance itself from their day-to-day operations." First, printers don't need Adobe. The PDF format they cherish in their workflows for interchange is an ISO standard. While Adobe may choose to try to influence its further development, the truth is that the horse has left the barn and is heading for high grass. Second, things change. There is always room for the next new product that unleashes even more power for printers in the spaces Adobe once protected and promoted. Adobe has said for years in private meetings and public forums that their focus is on the eBook, the web, and other electronic delivery means. They have also made it clear for years that they don't get revenue from the PDF format and its use in the industry, and that bothers them... a lot. So, they killed a program. Perhaps the new program will offer more help, more involvement. In the mean time... I look to my local InDesign Users Group for help, training, and resources. That's my Baht....
By Steve Wilson on Feb 04, 2010
Like Jim, I was signing up for the program. After being laid off and on the verge of starting my own business, I had budgeted on this program as I had through prior CS releases. It's kinda sad for the little guy because it made you feel part of something bigger.
By Long Island Website, SEO, Graphic Design Pros on Feb 12, 2010
HI, I'm John from www.graphicheadquarters.com in Massapequa NY. I have 15 years of NYC ad agency experience and have been in business for myself for 10 years. Quark was always the page layout choice in NYC ad agencies. I still use it daily and don't have the time to learn a whole new application like InDesign. Does it really matter what page layout application we use since we usually generate a PDF to email or upload for printing?
Discussion
Only verified members can comment.