Following a “watchdog” article in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel written by Daniel Bice claiming that the Institute for Graphics and Imaging (IGI) had all kinds of dire problems and was poorly managed, I contacted Ron Dahl, the executive director, and Joel Quadracci, one of the Board members to find out what was really going on.
Many of the facts in Bice’s article were accurate, but he positioned it as though it were an exposé when in fact the issues he “uncovered” were not at all unknown to Dahl, the Waukesha County Technical College (WCTC) where the Institute is housed, or its Board. Quadracci indicated that Quad/Graphics was a huge supporter of the Institute because there are so many printers within a several hundred mile radius that desperately need the training the center can provide. Quad/Graphics, because of its scale, has internal training, but smaller to mid-sized printers don’t have that luxury and need a resource like IGI.
“Ron has done an incredible job in putting together programs,” Quadracci told me, “but in the last 18 months, the budgets people had to work with on training have all been cut. I have talked to a lot of small printers about this. If they don’t have the money to send people, it doesn’t matter what the program is.”
Bice alleged that Dahl was moonlighting, with a business he owns out of Arizona, intimating that this was part of the issue with the Institute and was somehow under the radar, but both Quadracci and Dahl informed me that this arrangement was in Dahl’s contract from day one. Quadracci said, “The bottom line is we needed someone really good, and Ron is really good. We couldn’t afford him completely on our own, so we agreed to this arrangement where he does some consulting. It is not a significant amount of time, nor does he abuse it. We did this so we could get the best person for the job. If he were doing this without our knowing, that would be a different story.”
Dahl has also been busy talking with printers and others, looking for alternatives. “Printers today are losing money, especially the small to mid-sized printers we were targeting. They tell me that they know they need the training, and will need it even more when the economy recovers. They want the IGI to be around then so they can get the training they need. The talent pool we have assembled to deliver classes is second to none.” Dahl indicates that according to the business plan, some 60% of revenues were targeted to come from classes, with several other sources of revenue, including renting space in the Institute to corporations and others for training. “A year ago today, we were set,” he says, “but the slide started in about April. This past summer there were virtually no classes that we offered that had adequate attendance to justify holding them.”
In light of the situation, this week the WCTC has provided a 90-day notice to the Institute per the contract that is in place between the two organizations, and the Board of IGI will be meeting next week to determine the future of the Institute and what role Dahl might continue to play. “Perhaps we can offer courses on a scaled back basis, renting space as needed,” said Quadracci, “do more online courses—basically all options are on the table.” He added that the Board has been working for the past year to shore things up and WCTC has been very supportive. “At the end of the day,” he states, “the organization has to support itself. The school (WCTC) has its own needs and can use the space.”
Quadracci also informed me that IGI had sufficient cash to pay all back debts and those have been settled this week. “It is too bad this did not work out,” he said. “It is an important initiative for the region, but it relies on people having money to send students to the classes. There is nothing surprising in the chain of events. The timing was simply unfortunate. There are schools, associations and businesses all over the country that are in the same situation.”
It is sad to lose a resource like IGI which had great potential for helping printers adjust to new market realities. Hopefully the Board can come up with some alternative strategies to keep the Institute going in some form. We wish them well, and I am sure our readers do as well. We plan to stay informed on the outcome, and perhaps there are some among our readers who can offer creative suggestions to help Ron and the Board in their decision process.
Discussion
By Michael J on Dec 11, 2009
Thanks for the follow up. As usual the mainstream press has to shout fire to get eyeballs. Nice to have a grown up to clarify what really is going on.
Just a thought:
Would it be possible to partner with Community Colleges in the region. I think there's lots of stimulus and foundation money floating around for community colleges. Here's one story picked up yesterday about Gates
Gates Foundation Grants Focus on Community Colleges - - Campus Technology http://ilnk.me/e4f
Maybe there is a possibility of helping smaller printers by setting up some kind of mentor apprenticeship program with Com college kids. The experts do it on line. The printers give the kids experience in the real world.
The low hanging fruit would be to use the kids as mentored sales and marketing people. I wouldn't be surprised if some local graphic designers would be eager to get involved.
In any case, it's a great effort and I hope that a way will be found to leverage the effort, time and money that has already been invested.
By Cary Sherburne on Dec 11, 2009
Michael, thanks for your response, and for your suggestion to IGI. It is a good one. I knew we would get some good ideas from our wonderful readers! Hope there are more to come.
By Bob on Dec 11, 2009
Great article, it's sad that at a time when companies are slower have the time to send people for training the resource $$ to do so are not available to them. Perhaps this should be explained to Washington.
By Daniel Bice on Dec 11, 2009
Here is one question for you to tackle: If the situation at IGI was so well known, why did Ron Dahl resist providing records when I first asked for them? If you do an open records request, you will see that back in October he wanted to charge the Journal Sentinel $450 up front before providing us with the documents.
Two other questions: (1) If IGI's seminars were doing so well early on, why did they bring in less revenue in 2007-'08 than in 2008-'09? Check the 990s and compare them with the original projections. (2) If the decline started in April, why were four of IGI's five workshops canceled in the first quarter of this year?
The answers might help provide the "truth to about the Institute for Graphics and Imaging."
By Irmason on Dec 11, 2009
As an employee of a Southeastern Wisconsin commercial printer and an attendee of one of the institute's seminars I was very interested in reading Mr. Bice's story.
I was surprised by the lack of attendance and the cancelling of so many of the seminars. The topics covered are all of a timely nature. The costs are more than reasonable compared to other training available in the area.
Do the right people know about the courses that are available? Is the information making it to the right people? We spend alot of money to maintain our hardware but are we failing to maintain the knowledge of the people responsible to make that hardware run efficiently? Blaming the economy is short sighted. What is needed now is a skilled and motivated workforce. Trained employees will be more loyal and will feel they have a leg up on the competition. These are a couple of keys to a successful company.
The Institute for Graphics and Imaging is a valuable local asset. I was happy to see a story with some direct impact to my area of employment make it to the front page of the local newspaper. I hope there will be a happy ending reported as well? If not then at least the "truth".
By Brit Swisher on Dec 11, 2009
IGI - Institute for Graphics and Imaging shares the campus with WCTC - Waukesha County Technical College - Printing and Graphics Center. PIW - Printing Industries of Wisconsin also has offices on the same campus.
It's a very good facility for training people entering the industry via WCTC, as well as ongoing education through IGI Seminars.
If you've had to make a tough decision to reduce your staff, resources for training become even more important.
Unfortunatley the current business climate makes it tough for many graphics companies to justify training at a time when they may need it the most.
By Michael J on Dec 12, 2009
I found a video this morning that might be thought provoking and maybe even helpful.
It's about the Aspire program at the University of New South Wales. The take away for me was that by doing good - helping 11 years map out possible futures, they do well - help enrollments at the University.
http://ilnk.me/e90
There might be a way to align the interests of WCTC, the printing companies and the IGI to the benefit of all.
The reality is that kids start seeing their future at the age of 11 or 12. The research says that even more important than wealth or background is the lack of vision of poor kids about the possible futures they can earn. That's the brilliance of the UNSW program.
What might happen if the problem that pulls everyone together is helping kids not wind up as dropouts or druggies.
The WTCC does a deal with the local middle schools to do an ASPIRE type program. (I have to believe there is grant money around. ) The printers can then become teachers instead of students.
In my 30 years of printing followed by 7 years of teaching, I know from personal experience the best way to learn is to teach. Plus every real printer I ever met loves to share the excitement of a trade with a 500 year old tradition and Ben Franklin as it's model.
By Michael J on Dec 12, 2009
Daniel,
With all due respect, the issue of the "truth about IGI" may be interesting to some. But I think that Whether X said Y at point Z is just a reply of a journalist meme of the 35 year old Watergate stuff. It was the beginning of journalist as hero.
Sometimes, but not all that often, that is a reality. I think the meme that is now emerging is Journalist as teacher. (Which I think Cary does very well in the post.)
"What do they know and when did they know it." Sometimes that is important. But very often it misses the real point of telling a complex nuanced story.
By Daniel Bice on Dec 12, 2009
Michael,
Thanks for your discussion about the direction of journalism, though I think you misunderstood my points.
I am not interested in what was said when and by whom. Likewise, my line about "the truth" at IGI was a reference to the claim made in the headline of this story, not the incarnation of a tired journalistic meme.
I was simply pointing out that Cary may have been misled by some of statements repeated in his story, a few of which are contradicted by documents kept by WCTC and IGI.
It is poor journalism to allow interested parties both to frame the story and to fill in the details, particularly when there are contemporaneous records that provide a more complete -- or even alternative -- story. That's something any reporter should realize.
By Michael J on Dec 12, 2009
Fair enough.
So as I understand it, the issue you want to focus on is
“A year ago today, we were set,” he says, “but the slide started in about April."
And your point is that isn't really plausible given the facts you bring to bear.
If that's accurate, then it may mean that the strategy was, in fact, flawed from the start. So many errors are made by so many very smart people, this would not that surprising. If the folks who run GM and Lehman, not to mention the globals in our industry can get it so wrong for so long, I think it should give this rest of us the space to also get it wrong.
The trick is not, not making mistakes, but to think about what went wrong and why so others can learn from our experience.
Anyway, if my reasoning makes sense, it might be useful to see if we can figure out what was wrong in the first place and what might be changed to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.
By Bob on Dec 14, 2009
So if the point of IGI is to teach are they being to limited by focusing just on serving the industry. Would it be of help to add advance or even beginner classes designed to help High Schools Students. Perhaps there are schools in the area that cannot afford to have graphics classes. So if those Senior students were able to attend a class at IGI it may perk up their interests and help flow students into the graphics schools in the area. Is it such a bad thing to sharing some of the building with WCTC if that helps to balance the books.
By Michael J on Dec 14, 2009
Bob,
I can't see why it wouldn't work. Consider also going even lower. The University of New South Wales in Australia has a program that reaches out to 11 year olds. Bringing them to campus to help them see the possibilities that are available to them. If the get excited at middle school it gives them a focus and a goal.
It's not surprising that the research shows that many future high school dropouts were doing pretty ok, until they hit middle school. My take is that if they don't start finding a goal then, the danger of them falling through the cracks just gets higher and higher.
By Michael J on Dec 14, 2009
Sorry for two in row, but I wanted to add two data points from my experience.
In student evaluations at Parsons the consistently "best" classes were plant visits. They loved them.
It's one of the very many reasons that Roy Zucca always gets the highest ratings among our little group that taught production and project management at Parsons.
The other point is that invariably the reaction to see monster machines spitting out print after print and eating up stacks of huge sheets of paper was, as the kids say "awesome."
Once I took the class to visit the production facilities of the New York Times. Every kid who went thought is was "mind blowing."
By Bob on Dec 15, 2009
very good point about going even younger. It was quite a long time ago, but I was first exposed to printing when I was in 8th grade and it became focus of study in high school and eventually my career.
By Michael J on Dec 15, 2009
For me it was working as a messenger in the shop in which my dad was the master pressman when I was also in junior high school.
Here's a honest question for the assembled visitors:
Are there enough boomer types with a little time on their hands to do some kind of fund raising effort to get the folks on the ground the resources to implement this kind of approach?
I will help with blogging and tweeting as well as contribute some cash to get it started it.
What I need to know to get involved that there is someone on the ground -- best would be an evangelist on the ground at WCTC - minimum requirement would be a sincerely interested person -- that likes this approach and it fits into the scope of their day job.
This is a sincere offer. I will volunteer to get the conversation organized someplace on line. Much better would be if someone else for whom that might have brand building value wants to do it. Lou Burcell has done an amazing job as manager of "2d Codes for Digital Media" at LinkedIn.
I kibbutzed a tiny little bit at the beginning, but I think he has built it to over 600 memebers around the world.
We need three people and one person on the ground.
The only rules are NO MEETINGS. NO CONFERENCE CALLS.
Any takers?
By Erik Nikkanen on Dec 15, 2009
The idea of aiming to interest even younger people in printing seems like a good idea but then it also has a darker side. Who is being served by doing this?
It seems a little like the tobacco industry trying to make smoking look cool in order to get a new generation of customers. It benefits the industry but not necessarily the young user.
Personally I would never recommend a career in the printing industry to a young person I knew. Of course the industry has some interesting work but it has a shrinking future. To a young person I would suggest that they get as good an education or trade skill as they could get. Some thing that is portable and will be in demand.
If you want to go into business and be a manager, go to a business school and then you can work in the graphic arts or any other industry. If you want to be more technical, become an engineer or scientist. If you want to have a trade, then be an electrician or mechanic or plumber. If you still want to be in the graphic arts, be a graphic designer because that is hard to automate and it can be used in lots of industries besides commercial printing.
It seems that an effort to try and get young people into graphic arts education is just a way to help keep the failing institutions alive with little concern for those young people's future.
If the graphic arts was such a good career option then it should attract young people with higher salaries, steady employment for the future and good working conditions. If it can't do that then the industry really does not need them. Let the market decide.
By Michael J on Dec 16, 2009
Erik,
I'm sure you know that I respect your work and your thinking. I still think that sooner or later some Chinese or Indian based press manufacturer is going to buy what sounds to me like a great advance in offset printing.
But on this one, you are 100% wrong.
The fact of the matter is that very smart people - not me - believe that the next epoch of the internet and social media is about making connections between the virtual and the real world. In the real world that means print.
As you probably know I can go on and on and on... But I'll stop with just a thought and a link to an interview...
Versioned print either offset or digital with QR codes is an awesome way to increase the value of social media.
Let's talk after you've had a chance to listen:
http://ilnk.me/f39
By Erik Nikkanen on Dec 16, 2009
Michael,
Well I listened to something for a wasted half hour that had nothing to do with printing.
My earlier comments were about career choices for young people. You seem to feel there is a big opportunity for print due to the increase in the internet options. I don't see that and anyway those people that are entrepreneurs and probably not educated in the printing culture, will be the ones that take advantage of the opportunities.
The market will decide. If there are such opportunities as you suggest, the print market will pull the young people in. If the market continues to shrink then it won't. I just don't like the idea of getting young people interested in something that does not have a positive future IMO.
By Michael J on Dec 16, 2009
Well, you believing that the half hour was wasted and that print doesn't have a positive future is what makes markets and horse races.
Perhaps we'll have the space or time someday to have what will no doubt be a heated, but interesting discussion at another time.
My take away from the radio show is that the next sea change in the web is connecting the virtual world with the physical world.
Either it will be content first produced on the web in XML format turns into PDFs or data streams, and then delivered to niche markets in print.
Or it will taking advantage of the efficiency of print products to connect to web resources through 2 d codes.
But as I see, in every market there have to be two sides. One willing to sell. The other willing to buy. And everyone thinks they're correct.
Time will tell.
By Erik Nikkanen on Dec 16, 2009
I don't know if we are talking about the same interview but the one I heard was talking about marketing with twitter and retwittering. I was expecting some comments about how print was involved but never heard any.
I can assure you that I am not happy that the printing industry is falling apart but it seems that it is and I see no reason why it will get better. In good times or bad times, the industry will not innovate internally. They are not risk takers in that sense. They may make risky purchases of technology but they won't put any effort into thinking and innovating past the competition. This does not make me happy at all.
It is great that you feel positive about things but I just can't. If some good opportunities come along, I am guessing that most printers will pass on them and wait till it is proven, but of course that is too late.
By Michael J on Dec 16, 2009
The issue of the interview is that there are ways to use scientific approaches to measuring twitter, etc and other social media. But that is a much longer conversation....
I agree that the globals have a very, very hard time innovating. But printers on the ground have a great record for "tinkering" their way to survival.
Responding to any real customer demand is what customer facing family owned print shops do very well. Cold type, then desktop type, then desktop color then the PDF revolution, etc.etc.
Yes many have taken big hits when the rules and technology change. Yes science is usually not part of the equation. But the ones that have gotten through the last ten years have proven they have what it takes to change and survive.
It's probably what accounts for this nutty industry being around for 500 years.
By Brenda K on Dec 17, 2009
Michael,
At EDSF, a scholarship foundation supporting students entering our industry, we couldn't agree with you more. Every year we take scholarship recipients to an industry trade show and they love it. Seeing the industry come alive "up close and personal" is very meaningful for them. There are great teachers in the classroom, but being able to touch and feel is vitally important. If IGI could in some way help with this approach it would be wonderful.
We also want to praise Ron Dahl for his contribution, not only to the industry, but for his participation on the EDSF scholarship selection committee. This is a very worthwhile, although time consuming, process to be involved with and his dedication and enthusiasm are much appreciated.
IGI has our support and best wishes going forward.
By Cary Sherburne on Dec 17, 2009
It should be no big surprise that IGI and WCTC have terminated their relationship and IGI will be moving out by the end of the year: http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/79470242.html
Hopefully, IGI will be able to continue its mission in some form. Meanwhile, our readers have provided some great suggestions as to a format and mission moving forward.
By Michael J on Dec 18, 2009
That's disappointing. I would have hoped someone at the college would have seen the opportunity. Since I came of age in the days when "follow the money" became the journalists mantra I wonder if anyone could let me know if I've got this right:
Perhaps Daniel could help.
Is it :
Quad sets up a non profit. Raises a bunch of money. Builds and furnishes a building. At the end of the day, the non profit takes the risk, the project crashes and WTCT gets the building.
Or is it that taxpayers pay for the building?
By Michael J on Dec 18, 2009
Sorry for two in a row ...
I've always believed that the job of Community Colleges was to increase social capital in their communities http://ilnk.me/fc1
I have a pretty good idea of how Quad does exactly that.
Perhaps someone from WTCT might like to weigh in on precisely how they increase the social capital in the community.
What's the percentage of students who enroll actually complete the course of student?
What precisely are the jobs and life outcomes for graduates versus non graduates versus non attendees five years out?
Probably they don't have the stats. Quad and other printers live and die by the numbers. That's why I think that education and selling degrees is the single best business in America.
It's also why I think PIA should consider seriously getting into that business and cut out the middle man.
By Michael J on Dec 18, 2009
Just got my answer over at Graphic Comm Central
http://ilnk.me/fec
Some $3 million in taxpayer-backed bonds were used to pay for the construction of the Harry V. Quadracci Printing Education and Technology Center, the building that houses the Institute for Graphics and Imaging on the Waukesha County Technical College campus.
So as usual, taxpayers kids pay the bills and the school gets the building.
If folks are concerned about "deficits" with no payback, this is a textbook example.
By Catherine C on Dec 20, 2009
Having been the IGI Curriculum Manager January 14, 2009 - March 19, 2009, I have a vested interest in both the unfolding of the story and the resulting outcome.
A seasoned veteran of thirty-years in the graphic communications arena, a Professor of the same for twenty-years, and a long-term business owner in the field entertaining fortune 500 companies, gave credence to the eight viable marketing concepts I presented to Ron Dahl and the IGI Board on March 12, 2009, in an attempt to save the IGI from its demise.
Executive Director of IGI Ronald Dahl’s interests were split with other employment at Intel; which means the $112,000 he received in compensation was for part-time work.
As the Curriculum Manager for the IGI, it was my responsibility to develop or find courses, and to locate qualified instructors to teach them. My role also required me to give Mr. Dahl at least six weeks lead-time to market these courses. I met these timelines as required; however, the IGI did not market these workshops as promised. Typically, news releases and announcements did not go out until four weeks prior to the scheduled workshop. Mr. Dahl was also required to notify contracted instructors if a course was to be cancelled, ten days prior to the start date. Do the math – the time allotted to market these courses was two and one-half weeks.
The IGI’s failure to market these workshops in a timely manner resulted in one workshop after another being cancelled. During my short employ, one out of the nine courses contracted ran with minimum headcount. My attempts at communicating my concern to Mr. Dahl, the IGI Board, and the WCTC college president were ignored. I realized that the reputation of the center would be permanently damaged by this lack of marketing effort and I wanted to avoid it at all costs.
I may never know why my concerns were ignored; I only know that my desire was to help make the IGI successful.
It is unfortunate that the IGI failed, but there is little anyone can do about it now.
Mr. Dahl’s first stop for my Curriculum Manager interview, was to show me the three laptops sitting on his IGI office desk, necessary to run his company, Digital Color Source, the product of which was in the IGI office cabinets.
It was extremely difficult for me to schedule courses around Mr. Dahl’s dates of unavailability, traveling frequently out of the country, for Digital Color Source. During my employ, he told me he would be out of the office and unable to contact January 1, 2, 3, 4, February 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, April 4/1, 4/2, 4/3, 4/4, 4/5, 4/6, 4/7, 4/8, 4/9, 4/10, 4/11, 4/12. During his extended weekends each week, he noted he was too busy running Digital Color Source to attend to IGI. I, however, was to be available 24/7.
Ron noted he needed to be present for the workshops, but could possibly hide the only key to the building, outside in the snow. Upon my query as to why he needed to be present, he replied he needed to be there to direct forklifts. What forklifts?
My expenses fell well within budget per my contract. My many attempts to correspond with Mr. Dahl resulted a certified letter delivery refusal on May 19, 2009. On June 11, 2009, I received a letter from attorney Raoul R. Ehr of the law office of Ehr S.C., noting that I would not be reimbursed.
I delivered the eight marketing concepts on March 12, 2009. On March 19, 2009, Mr. Dahl fired me via fax, after telling me to “cease and desist” as I was “over-stepping my bounds,” marketing being his responsibility. Ron’s marketing consisted of posting courses on the Events Calendar of the IGI’s website, news releases with regard to employee hires in trade publications, 8.5 x 11” laser prints taped to the doors of the IGI building and email blasts, all of which received only a handful of responses.
Mr. Dahl noted he had no funds to pay me, but he would request a stipend from the board for the 372 hours I worked in an attempt to get the IGI off the ground. I never receive one. How then were there funds available to pay his $112,000 salary, of which he would frequently jest?
Discussion
Only verified members can comment.