Frank Romano’s provocative article asking “Where have all the students gone?” and the equally incisive responses to it have raised enough issues to keep a thread on industry education running indefinitely. But I was particularly struck by several comments that go straight to the heart of what’s been wrong with so many earnest but feckless attempts to attract young people to careers in printing.
“For the most part,” writes Frank, “high school kids do not want to be printers...No high schooler, even a nerd, says ‘I want to be an estimator when I grow up.’"
One respondent thinks the problem lies with the recruitment tools we have been employing: “The material they use should be cool—a kid's cool, not a middle-aged business executive's cool.” But another poster zeroes in on what’s really the matter: “Your most important point is to make this industry more enticing to our younger generation. Short of developing a video game that some how mixes in snipers stealing cars while running a printing press, I am not quite sure how to go about it.”
Precisely. It’s time for the industry to stop portraying itself as “cool,” “enticing,” or anything else it imagines will appeal to an audience whose sensibilities it doesn’t share. Personal experience teaches that when you try to strike a “cool” pose with anybody more than 10 years your junior, the reaction you are most likely to get is embarrassed amusement. Why then do we think that a recruiting approach based upon our conception of “cool” will have a shred of credibility with young people who already believe—correctly—that we are quite clueless in this regard?
Printing is not a “cool” career adventure for those in search of instant gratification or a nicely compensated good time—it is a serious calling for a handful of entrants who possess the discipline, intelligence, and stamina to serve the craft as it must be served. Efforts to depict careers in printing as anything but strenuous, demanding lifetime assignments only patronize—and therefore put off—the few who actually have what it takes to accept the torch of craftsmanship from an older generation that is growing increasingly worried about where to pass it on.
Respondents to Frank’s initial article said it best. “We are not seeing as many young people in our industry or others because it is work, plain and simple,” wrote one. Another declared: “Print is not sexy. It is not the ‘next wave’ of anything. It’s like plumbing, you don't notice it until it doesn’t work. It has a 500+ - year tradition of capturing some of humanities greatest achievements (books) and worst (junk mail). It is also the butt-end of a computer. It is its output.” Blunt words, these, but honest. As career advice, they will be a red flag to some; but to others, a professional challenge that will transform their lives.
It will never be easy to attract young people to careers in printing. It shouldn’t be—and the industry shouldn’t be ashamed of the exclusivity that the perennial difficulty of filling its ranks implies. As one poster observed, no matter what we do, printing always sends a certain number of students scurrying in the opposite direction when they first encounter it: “I have to laugh on the occasions that they have a tour group of kids, either high school or college, come through our shop. We usually refer to those as the “‘Scared Straight Tours.’"
But sometimes the hook goes in. Another writer recalls, “The best career day was one in which we brought a press in. It was held in the gym and a good number of tables were set up with representatives from different industries exhibiting to students, much like a trade show. It was just a small two color duplicator, but the kids went nuts. Enrollment in the printing class went up 40 percent.”
Has every student in that enrollment surge gone on to embrace printing as an academic concentration and a career path? Probably not. But in every group of this kind, one, or two, or possibly even three get the germ of an idea that printing could be the place where the world of work is calling them to fit in. For a still smaller number, that first flash of interest deepens into a vocation—not because anybody has sold them on the dubious notion that printing is “cool,” but because they have seen the occupation for what it is and have been captivated by it for reasons of their own.
Let’s not forget that one of the best ways we can promote careers in print is by introducing as many students as possible to printing as it’s practiced in shops and plants every day. To a select few, the message will be better than “cool”—it will be irresistible.
Discussion
By Thomas D. Greer on Jul 24, 2007
What hooked me, as a young professional burned-out on sales and channel management, was the technology of color. There seemed to be something akin to alchemy in the fact that four colors (nay, four dense, gleaming, liquid INKS) could combine to produce "any" color.
Then in the pre-press department, I saw this again, with the old-fashioned Mylar "overlay" proofs. Seeing how dots and colors could combine to produce an image appealed to my love of optical illusions. In fact, I realized with a visceral jolt, print IS an optical illusion.
When I saw how computers were involved, the decision was made. Even though I was in sales at the time, I was always the "computer guy" in the organization, writing scripts and macros to automate things. Computers were utilitarian; number crunchers. Now I saw computers producing art, calculating colors and dots and angles. Something tangible yet inherently illusory was being produced.
I accepted the position at the printing company, and became a programmer. That same feeling I had that day has permeated my career as a PostScript application developer, working to create web-to-print and transactional VDP systems. Numbers may come in, but full-color documents come out, and no matter how mundane that may sound to some, there is something profoundly satisfying in that process.
You want to attract the "right sort" of students? Show them four inks.
By Mary on Jul 25, 2007
I think one of the reasons people are not signing up for print education is that they are scared of becoming redundant in the near future. I'm sure if I lived in town like Rochester and watched relatives loose their jobs at Kodak I wouldn't be too keen on the print program there. I'm looking to get out of this business too for the same reason and I have been in it for 17 years. I had a blast, don't get me wrong, but job security and growth is pretty cool and looks fun and shiny compared to what I see coming down the pike. Young people are all about the future; they are smarter than we give them credit for. I would show them that print education is a good investment of their time. If you can't then you have to resort to bells and whistles. I'm not sure printers would be getting the right people then.
By zzz on Jul 25, 2007
Even if I'd thought of getting a printing job I woudn't after reading this post.
By Brian on Jul 25, 2007
I count myself among the lucky few who realized the power of print, in its many forms, at an early age. For me it was the lure of the printed word; the embodiment of that most elulsive form of noun: the idea.
Recruiters in the industry face challenges similar to that of other manufacturing processes. Print, in the hands of the right recruiter, can set itself appart from the big three by appealing in ways other manufacturing process can not. (Significant historical relevance, overwhelming ubiquity, technologically advanced, fast paced, somewhat competitive and my favorite; endlessly emotive.)
What are our industry organizations doing for us in terms of recruitment? Can the Idea Alliance advance our recruiting techniques as efficiently as they have our technological base? Can the PIA/GATF act to attract our potential recruits as well as they attract trainees to their excellent tutelage? Will the NAPL promote education in print technology in their development of printing management professionals?
We can all do more to recruit the excellent people we see every day in our lives in this incredible industry. Step one, in my mind, is appealing to the security that the printing industry has traditionally offered. Dr. B. always said "someone has to print the eviction noticies!"
By Brian Regan on Jul 25, 2007
I disagree in some ways with this post. While I agree that the industry needs solid, strong work ethic and bright people, it is rather arrogant to suggest that the attractiuon process be scoffed at in any creative form. The object is to create a buzz and gain excitemnt to create a pool of interested people.
Once you have a pool you can then thin it out based on skill requirments, work ethic and other primary needs of the industry. The object is not to create a situation where you scare most young people away before the industry is able to explain it self to them and dare I say RECRUIT the good ones. We need to make sure we have a healthy amount of talented young people in print related college courses and taking advantage of the scholarships that are out there.
The other issue that you did not address is the parents. It amazes me that printing people drive their own children away from the industry. I am proud of my print back ground and the values it has given me. I would not change it for anything. If anyone needs to be recruited to help its the parents. Your print executive many not be cool to the younger people, but they will sure resonate with the parents. Lets not forget them in this issue or its solutions. This issue not just about the young people coming in, but a multi-tiered approach.
By Lee Rowland on Jul 25, 2007
The allure of printing for me was the fact that it encompasses so many skills. Printing is art, chemistry, computers, graphics, mechanical, engineering, the written word, production and the satisfaction of the finished product. One person can understand and practice every disciplin and skill set needed. I think appealing to the wonder and "alchemy" of the whole process to the finished piece can be a hook. The idea of the four colors blending to make "any" color was more appealing and mysterious before desktop and digital print. Everyone pretty much knows that trick by now. It was pretty "cool" to introduce that mystrey to people years ago.
By Chris Harmon on Jul 25, 2007
I have worked in the graphic arts for nearly two decades now, and have worn a lot of different hats. As an industry we must face these facts: 1.) today's younger generation has a totally different career value system than generations past, 2.) information delivery has changed permanently, and 3.) we have been our own worst enemy in portraying this as a desirable career.
We live in the age of Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton- glitz, glamour, zero personal responsibility and gobs of cash. These are just not part of the printing world. Well, maybe cash, but only if you are the business owner or a press salesman.
When I was a student in the Master's program at NYU's Graphic Communications department, I was the ONLY American studentin several classes- and also quite a few years older than my classmates from places like China, Taiwan, Thailand and South America. Let's face it- American kids don't want to be printers. And with so many companies sending their printing overseas, who could blame them? Kids today are smart- they have seen their parents go through career hell, and they are not eager to repeat it. So why would they want to sign-on to a career that already seems to be disappearing? They are not falling for the “just work hard and you will make it up the career ladder” when they’ve already seen the top rungs sawn off.
Another issue is how today's youth get information. They don't read papers or books- they are on the Internet, baby. Myspace, Google, Youtube- these are their worlds. The need for immediate gratification is so high that printed materials just don't cut it- and they never will. We are talking about a generation that adopts technology so fast, that even music CD's are obsolete. They don't read it, and they don't need it- so why would they bank their career on it?
The last problem is the perception of printing itself, and we are own worst enemy here. It is viewed as “blue collar work,” not a noble lifelong craft as it is in places like Europe and Asia. Also at issue is the perception of how employees are treated. Layoffs, plant closings, overseas outsourcing, erratic management, unpaid overtime, decreasing benefits, razor thin profit margins- none of these are appealing to the Ipod generation. The old school mentality that still pervades most of printing seems barbaric to them. As I mentioned earlier, this new crop of kids is savvy- too savvy to be pulled in by tacky slogans or middle-aged marketing hype.
The question is not “how are we going to change today’s kids to our way of thinking?” but rather, “how do we need to change as an industry in order to face the future?”
By Joanne Rock on Jul 25, 2007
http://www.industryweek.com/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=14590#
A link to an interesting related article on finding people for the manufacturing industry as a whole.
By Terry Myers on Jul 25, 2007
I got into printing like many, because it was a family business. I was raised around printing presses and used to play with the punch out dots of Singer typesetter tape puncher. It was in my blood. However, had I not had that experience, I doubt I would be in Printing. Now that I am firmly entrenched in the industry, the things that I find appealing are the high technology and ever changing work flow. In my 20 some years in the industry, it has changed dramatically. I think that the technology and the dynamic work flow because of technology should appeal to the next generation....but how are we getting that message out?
By Bryan Yeager on Jul 25, 2007
Being a current undergrad at RIT (in the School of Print Media), I have somewhat of a fresh perspective at this whole education banter that's been going back and forth for a long while now. I've been interested in this issue for a little over 2 years now. First of all, the assumption of this article is right and wrong. While "cool" printing campaigns have failed in the past, it's not because printing isn't cool. People just don't know how to market it correctly. It's all about how you define print, and peoples' perceptions of that definition. If peoples' perception of print is that it's a dirty, labor-intensive, craft-based industry that only has blue-collar based jobs (these aspects are becoming much less relevant), well then you've obviously lost most students right there. However, if you can change that perception of print to being state-of-the-art, high-tech, creative, and evolving with lots of opportunity (which it is, at least in my eyes), then you have the chance at branching out and bringing tons of new talent in. Print is a science. Print is technical. Print is engineering. Print is information technology. Print is creative. Print is marketing. Print is advertising. Print is business. Print is management. Print is EVERYWHERE and it's not going away. Print is infused in many different aspects of life. Those aspects need to be tapped in order to attract new people into the industry. I'm working on a project that will do that (more on that in the near future). Stop referring to printing as a craft. Sure, maybe if you do casual screenprinting or printmaking, it may be a craft. However, most shops, even the small ones, have upgraded their equipment over the years in order to produce somewhat predictable and repeatable results. I'm not trying to diminish a rich past, but let's focus on the present. It's a science, guys. Getting everyone to understand that is half the battle. Also, four-year colleges like RIT should not be recruiting at vocational technical schools anymore. The landscape of vo-tech schools has changed dramatically over the past 30 years. 95% of kids that go to vo-tech school go because they do bad in regular school and need to learn a trade to get a job after high school. While it used to be common for vo-tech grads to go to college (like my dad did), it's not so anymore. The most you can usually expect is 2-year college, which is totally fine. Don't balk at me for saying this because it's the truth. I've witnessed it first-hand. Looking for a pressman or other operating technician? Look no further than a vo-tech school. Four-year colleges should be focusing on yearbook and newspaper programs in high school, as well as schools with prominent computer-based Graphic Design classes. Yearbook and newspaper programs at schools give kids real-world production experience. While a lot of those kids want to go to school for journalism or photography, there's still usually someone that manages the production and does the layout. Reach out to computer science programs as well, and even the art programs. Print can be extremely creative, and I think that's really lost in a lot of print marketing ploys. As much as you don't want to hear it, print needs to stop revolving around the pressroom. The press is just another tool in the whole scope of a company, such as computers and software packages. With these different tools come different skill sets required to make a company function as a whole. Focus on the big picture and maybe something good will come of it. That's what I'm doing. You should, too.
By Noel Ward on Jul 25, 2007
Thank you Brian Yeager for saying a lot that needed to be said.
As I note in my blog entry http://printceoblog.com/2007/07/bachelors-to-run-a-digital-press" rel="nofollow">Do You Need a Bachelor's Degree to run a Digital Press, vo-tech and tech colleges are where iGen, Indigo and NexPress drivers are going to come from. Offset and flexo operators, too.
We need to do as you say and portray printing in an entirely different way.
We all need to get together and do this. Who wants to help?
By Paul Davis on Jul 25, 2007
I read with interest Mr. Romano's article on education. The comments are also insightful.
I am a 20 year teacher at a technical college and I can attest to the declining interest in the print industry, and the decline of support to technical colleges. Let's face it demographics have changed, but a press helper from a four year college?
Much attention is paid at the high school level and long term recruitment. But what happens after graduation? Who markets to the nineteen or twenty year old, etc. There is a pool of potential employees out there. Unfortunately, industry maintains the Vo-Tech mentality. I sometimes refer to it as the June/September issue.
Everybody calls in June wanting a graduate but very few call in September to provide a student. Once an employee is found the problem goes away (until another employee is needed).
There needs to be as much attention paid to developing training programs instead of waiting for a magic pill. Remember, industry has input to the system. Don't wait for an administrator to solve the problem. It takes ongoing involvement, monitoring and support.
Also, what about training and upward mobility within the shop. I have partnered with a national printer to create classes for their employees. This gives me enrollment, the students attend free, and there is little or no cost to the company. Partnering can work.
By Nick on Jul 30, 2007
Recruitment???...the printing trade can't even take care of it's current employees, and as a result the people who get treated as a commodities do not encourage their family and friends to go into the trade.....as Chris Harmon point out, layoffs, plant closings, overseas outsourcing, erratic management, unpaid overtime, decreasing benefits, razor thin profit margins do not make for good word of mouth. According to the ILL dept of labor printing is a slow growth industry, do you think schools are going to spend money on trying to teach such a trade? Schools are a business after all and they also have to be concerned with the bottom line. That is why they are churning out designers, people want to have such a job and more and more designers are also doing pre-press work as well. Furthermore, i am sick and tired of printing companies who complain about not being able to find qualified employees. Very few printers or pre-press houses want to train employees these days. Train them yourself i say, but they comeback is always "what if they leave after we train them?" If you offer someone a decent wage and treat them in a professional manner, you won't have that problem but that is not the case these days.
By Kellie Gibson on Jul 31, 2007
My point of view . . . here in Reality, USA
In 1979 I dropped out of the University of Arizona because I was a vocal performance major, and how was I going to make a living with a degree like that? After 18 months of retail I became a "pasteup artist"--and I'm still in the business today. I've worked as typesetter, proofreader, editor, designer, production coordinator and prepress technician in ad agencies, educational publishing, photography, visual media, commercial printing and quick print. In the beginning the work was exciting and paid okay (because I'm female I never made as much as the men), and I could support myself. There was always something new to learn, and the variety of work allowed me to stay interested. I also had an unusual skill set: I could design, produce and spell--a real rarity.
Now, however, no one values my skills enough to pay me a decent wage. Most employers on Monster or locally here in Phoenix will not even accept your application without a degree-any degree, even if it's in vocal performance (duh). If you do get past the degree requirement, you find that the top salary for someone with a degree that's been there for ten years is $35k-and that's after they start you at $28k. I think the world at large doesn't care about misspellings, widows or orphans, or if they do they're just not willing to pay extra for them. Does anyone rag type any more? When's the last time someone looked up the correct
hyphenation for a word?
I have two daughters at college age now. Either one of them would be excellent in this field, but how can I send them down a road to nowhere? Why would they bust their tails for a degree so they can work in a sweaty, dirty, factory environment where men still rule, customers care more about price than quality, and you have to constantly learn new skills and corporate-speak terminology to stay employed at your first job (and you'll need a second one to cover groceries and gas).
I've loved the work I've done enough to stay with it these 28 years, but there's no way I can call it a career with a straight face.
By Greg Imhoff on Aug 06, 2007
Kellies "Raising Arizona" experience is valid and sad not only for her, but for our entire industry. This once proud business is consolidating under the search for elusive profits to find losing profits. Technology does not stand alone on this as the real issue and globalization is another factor to multi layered greed. All combine to be used against our industry self interests. How?
This business was made great from hard work interest and investment on a then level strong playing field. So stripping away the incentive to learn flex and grow just to "keep things running" may be akin to "stretching the taffy a wee bit too thin." American print productivity and quality together once stood out globally. One reason was print as a community here, followed known traditions on pricing standards and service which led to satisfied users profitably. This in turn brought out the best people products and solutions to the best market. In keeping industry profits reciprocating within our community by wise reinvestment in new technology and in fair wages continued to build and to increase our productively quality and owners equity.
The real issue now may be in our loss of printing markets and profits and if this transcends all, how to solve may be the real question...
1) If a few years back a printer as customer of a film plate or proofing manufacturer had a problem, that manufacture may have flown out multiple experts to meet with the dealer. at the printer site to audit solve and serve. These multiple sets of eyes and minds would normally come to a fast resolution educate the problem as factory or end user(s) owned solve and train. This formed a relationship and sometimes would find find more opportunities to solve and build upon in the same trip. So resulting services and increases America proactively essentially began to erode for a few % points on plates inks.
2) Training may be most parallel to standards so lets compare US training to apprenticeships in Switzerland or Germany where printing is regarded and not treated as cogs in a wheel. This relates to true product costs. Globalization may have others planning to take our print runs when they have a small labor advantage but this too is "Hobson's logic". Emerging printers need to purchase new equipment and so is more productive than our legacy presses but with higher operating costs and still pay for ink and paper so, a small % of labor when compared to shipping truly bears no advantage.
3) Print Standards for best in class quality service and speed and throughput matters for our market and owners. If all things are equal quality wins and the printer must prove this with standards. To regain our dominance and business is to focus on our productivities first via a new specifications for increased quality, throughput with profits that the printer should keep for reinvestment.
Americans globally are the hardest and most productive workers on the planet so, to train equip and support with a system like G-7 is to produce a greatly needed affordable solution for our industry. Use the GRACoL method of gray balance for improved production throughput quality and profits. Smart printers will also develop meaningful relationships with their suppliers not permitting price undercutting while receiving best in class service knowledge and support. So if we use our people and their gray matter wisely we may soon once again, be exporting more of our best prints and not just our best jobs overseas.
Discussion
Only verified members can comment.