WhatTheyThink

Premium Commentary & Analysis

Is Waterless the Future of Printing (by Inkjet)?

Andy examines waterless inkjet printing by visiting the first US installation of the Xerox CiPress 500 at dmh Marketing Partners in Mt. Pleasant, Iowa.

Monday, September 19, 2011

I get to visit many printers and suppliers in the course of my work. At the recent GraphExpo event in Chicago I went with a number of other industry analysts to see the first installation of the Xerox CiPress 500 waterless inkjet press. This was at dmh Marketing Partners at Mt. Pleasant, Iowa, some four and half hours by coach from Chicago into the mid-West farming country. While I have been tracking the development of this new Xerox press that has previously been previewed at IPEX in 2010 and at Hunkeler Innovationdays earlier this year, I really wasn't sure what to expect.

What I found was one of the most impressive production operations spearheaded, by the dmh VP of Technology, Randy Seberg. He discussed his company's partnership with Xerox that would allow dmh to substantially increase their business in the near future. Before going further with that let me outline the dmh company. The company is probably the largest and most successful mailing house in the USA. The company was founded in 1993 and today mails around 8.5 million mail pieces per day. Seberg states that dmh is a mailing company that prints, but not a printer that mails. They make their money by being the most efficient mailing manufacturing organization in N. America. As far as printing in the various dmh facilities they run most technologies and claim to be the largest Océ shop in N. America with a large number of continuous feed monochrome presses that are used to personalize offset printed content.

Around a year ago Seberg started discussions with Xerox concerning partnering in the development of the Xerox waterless inkjet press. The partnering is the important factor as Seberg wanted to able to define and evaluate his specific requirements for a high-speed continuous feed digital color press. Xerox was looking for an experienced user to help them finalize the structure of the press and to fully test it in production as a true beta tester. The first press was installed early this year and has been running production since then. The early prototype press was replaced later in the year with a twin-engine production model for full color duplex printing.

One of the principal reasons for Seberg's choice of the Xerox CiPress 500 press was that it would run normal offset papers and did not require special higher priced inkjet-optimized paper. He did not want to increase the number of papers held by the company.

As I stated before I have watched the development of this press over a number of years. I was lucky to see the early stages of its development in Xerox R&D many years ago. The use of standard offset uncoated papers has always been a key element for the press but it was only after the visit to dmh that the full advantages of this, and the fact that the press was a waterless press, really struck home. Earlier I had felt that the image quality may not be adequate and would not be competitive against the competition's presses that used aqueous (water based) inks. Seeing how dmh worked and what they produced could be viewed as like going to a religious event and getting converted (not that this has never happened to me). What I can now say is the Xerox CiPress 500, and other Xerox presses using the same technology, will be major drivers in changing the industry to adopt inkjet. Xerox may have been late on getting on the inkjet express train and many analysts and members of the press have thought they were too late to succeed. Well no! Xerox had its own unique high-speed inkjet express and it may well be that other suppliers may be in catch up mode to compete against.

I have in front of me something no other supplier has produced, and this is the CiPress 500 Paper Swatch Book. This shows the same images printed on the CiPress 500 using a wide range of standard offset papers. These include 45gsm AbiBow Newsprint; 44gsm Catalina Opaque; 60 gsm Appleton Utopia GW Book and Utopia Filmcoat: 74 gsm Domtar Husky Offset Opaque Vellum and Opaque Smooth; 90gsm UPM Prepersonal Faber Imprimerie: 148 gsm International Paper Accent Opaque Smooth; and 128 gsm Georgia Pacific White Topliner. There were many other standard papers with the same printed images in the book. All of them were very acceptable.

The benefits of waterless printing are seen in the fact the press does not have to use a drier to remove the water from the ink to allow it to dry. All aqueous presses have to remove the water to dry the print and this is perhaps the biggest problem for such presses. It can cause difficulties with paper curling and image registration. It also can limit the amount of ink coverage when running at full speed. Aqueous inks can also penetrate well into the paper and this will be seen as show through on lightweight papers. If inkjet optimised papers are used that are necessary to get good quality printing then at present these papers cost around 25 - 30% more than standard offset papers.

At this time Xerox does not offer printing onto coated papers on the CiPress 500, having done no testing on them at this at stage. One has to say however that few of Xerox's competitors' presses are printing on coated papers at this time. In fact I feel the future for inkjet printing may be to use matt papers and to post-coat them inline or offline to give the same appearance as offset gloss or matt-coated papers.

Following recent meetings I have had with Xerox and the visit to dmh, and in particular talking with Randy Seberg, I have become a convert to waterless inkjet as a real challenger in the growing inkjet market. I expect to see many developments on the technology by drupa next year to open up the market further. I would also expect that the CiPresss 500 will be the first of a family of Xerox waterless inkjet presses that will widen the scope of this technology for more areas of the market.


Continue reading your article
with a WhatTheyThink membership.

WhatTheyThink Annual Membership

Less than $4/week.

Get unlimited access to in-depth commentary and analysis covering the latest trends, emerging technologies, operational strategies, and key events across every segment of today's printing industry.

Stay informed. Stay competitive. Stay ahead.
WhatTheyThink Day Pass

$5 for 24 hours

Unlimited access to all of WhatTheyThink. Get your Day Pass

Already a member?
Sign In

About Andrew Tribute

Recent Articles from Andrew Tribute

Andy Tribute on Ipex

Andy Tribute on Ipex

Andy Tribute joins us from retirement to discuss Ipex, his local industry trade show. He discusses the challenges faced by Informa and how they transformed the event from a product driven show to a content-based show. Read More

Landa Nanographic Printing – A New Approach for Printing?

Andy Tribute reviews the nanography printing process and where Landa is with commercial availability of its Nanographic presses. How the claimed advantages of Nanographic presses compare to modern sheetfed offset and liquid toner technology and inkjet systems from Canon/Océ, Xeikon and Konica Minolta. Read More

IPEX 2014 Review

The Ipex 2014 event in London was not one for major product introductions. The size of the event was much smaller than originally planned due to the withdrawal of many of the major suppliers. Highlights include Konica Minolta, FFEI, LumeJet, Scodix, Riso and others. Read More

IPEX – A New Approach for Trade Shows

Ipex 2014, which moved from Birmingham to London, was anticipated to be the key event for availability of the raft of new digital presses announced at drupa 2012. Unfortunately Ipex was hit with two major difficulties. First the printing industry did not appear to be recovering from the recession, and second almost none of the new products announced at drupa were going to be ready for release by March 2014. Read More

Offset – Technology for the Future of USA’s Printing!

Please excuse this article coming after my retirement last year and my statement that you had seen my last article. I am taking the opportunity given to me by Randy Davidson to write the occasional guest editorial if I see a subject that I feel needs my own ‘unique’ take. Read More