Today, WhatTheyThink just released my special report on “electronic books,” or “e-books” titled E-Books and E-Publishing Primer. I acknowledge that in some parts of the industry, writing about e-books is tantamount to heresy, so to avoid a printing industry auto-da-fe, I have fled to Santa Fe. So I am blogging this from 5,000 feet above sea level, so if I sound a bit breathless, it’s not just my excitement about some of the latest developments in e-books.

First of all, I wrote the report—which is a basic primer on the latest e-book technologies, formats, and companies active in the e-book and e-magazine market—from the perspective of someone who is an avid reader of printed books. Always have been, always will be. I also wrote from perspective of someone who has written printed books, and would very much like to write more. But I also have no objection to my books being available in electronic format—in fact, I have myself formatted a novel I wrote and self-published some years ago for the Amazon Kindle.

At the same time, I have been avidly following the progress of electronic book readers, formats, and technologies since the mid-1990s, often with a skeptical eye, but also with more than a touch of anticipation and perhaps even excitement. I still vividly recall Seybold San Francisco 1999, when Patrick Henry and I collaborated on a brace of stories for the Show Daily and had a meeting with Microsoft’s Dick Brass, an early advocate of e-books, specifically the Microsoft Reader, and the be-kilted Bill Hill, who worked on Microsoft’s ClearType font-rendering technology. A year later, I had cajoled Gemstar into loaning me their e-book reading device, which was a decidedly unsatisfying experience (on a variety of levels). I had bought e-books for the Palm Reader which ran on a Handspring Visor PDA I had in the early 2000s (remember those?), and then lost them all when the Visor’s battery died. So it goes.

In a nutshell, there have been many missteps along the way. E-books are a technology that was pronounced dead back in 2004 or so. However, someone forgot to tell the people who were developing e-book software, hardware, and titles. The Amazon Kindle and its implementation of electronic paper kickstarted the e-book market again back in 2006, and new versions of the Kindle have been well-received in many quarters. The report also presents e-book sales data and I note that the growth in the sale of e-books has far outpaced the sales of printed books over the same period. So something is happening here--do we know what it is, Mr. Jones?

Still, there are those who write off the whole idea. Interestingly, I am blogging this from a breakfast table at a Science Writing Workshop having a discussion about e-books (as well as the "Ida" fossil which festoons Google's logo today) with a half a dozen professional scientists--extremely brilliant people--who are generally unfamiliar with e-books, and generally skeptical about their appeal.

While I do not have a Kindle, another driving force in the renaissance of e-books has been the availability of e-book apps for the Apple iPhone. In particular, I downloaded the free Amazon Kindle for iPhone app which lets me read any Kindle-formatted title right on my iPhone. There is also the (in my opinion, better) eReader, which is one of the readers that supports. (Both eReader and Fictionwise have been acquired by Barnes & Noble, which got bit early on so has been justifiably leery ever since, but has apparently deemed that the time is right to get back into the fray.)

In the report, I discuss my hands-on experience using these reading devices—both positive and negative.

There is an unfortunate mistake a lot of people make in framing the print-book/e-book conversation, which is thinking that it's an either/or decision, that you can only like printed books or you can only like e-books, and never the twain shall meet (even if you are reading a Mark Twain book). I think this is wrong. In an ideal world (good luck with that), books would be available to a single purchaser in a variety of formats. I have discovered that while I like reading printed books when at home or on holiday, e-books, particularly those I can store and read on my iPhone—a device I already own and carry around with me—are very useful when I am on a bus, subway, plane (although I have to take out the printed book during takeoffs and landings when you’re not allowed to have electronic devices turned on), or other “moving location” when toting around a printed book is a bit of a burden. Many years ago, I read David McCulloch’s 1100+-page Truman biography in hardcover while straphanging on the NYC subway—great for building upper body strength, but, oh, how I wished there had been an e-book version at the time!

Ultimately—and this is not just unique to books, but most content in general—what it comes down to is that different users have different preferences when it comes to the media they consume. Yes, there are many who prefer print, but there are also those who prefer electronic media. And sometimes, people prefer both, albeit at different times. Chacun à son goût. As media producers and content creators, it behooves us to bear this in mind—and how generational these trends may be. At the end of the day, content is content; it’s words and ideas that matter, and it’s a mistake to get hung up on an almost fetishistic devotion to one particular format.

At any rate, in my e-book report, I talk at great length about the pros and cons of the current crop of e-book devices—and where the market is likely to go in the near future.