I’m not sure about you but as someone who lives and breathes print I feel guilty about thinking, writing or talking about using alternative technology such as a Kindle or an iPad. But one could argue that the success with these devices may be the future and may be the only way to sustain the longevity of previously printed products such as books, magazines or newspapers.
Also, I should admit that as someone who flies in airplanes way too much, travels with a computer, a GPS and noise reduction headphones, my priorities may be different than the average consumer. With that said, I did a little research to see which would work better for me.
My method was simple – I test drove both devices. First, I went to the Apple store and played with the iPAD for hours. Then I borrowed my girlfriend’s Kindle and took it on a trip.
Here is what I found. I loved the iPad because of all the cool things you could look at on it. But I was frustrated when I tried to perform the work I do on my Mac laptop such as writing articles and creating slide presentations. And I was not happy about the cost of buying a data plan. It is great for content consumption but not great for content creation.
Admittedly it takes a little time to get used to reading on the smaller version of the Kindle. But after taking it on a trip, I found I loved the small format. I could read it on any airplane even when the guy in front of me leans back and I feel like a dentist about to drill a cavity. Buying books and magazines is a breeze and the newspapers are much easier to navigate and read than their paper cousins. I love the free access to the internet but I hate typing on the Kindle or trying to access the internet for anything other than the Kindle store.
In terms of technology, there is no doubt that the iPad is a much more impressive product. For pictures, videos and internet activities it is superior. But it’s larger, more expensive to buy and use and frustrating to type on. The Kindle is smaller, lighter, more convenient, cheaper and better on an airplane.
While I would love to have one device I could use for content creation, internet browsing, email and reading, I don’t think the iPad is there yet for me. Here is my thinking – at least today. I will continue to carry my laptop for content creation, use my Blackberry for mobile email and use the Kindle to read newspapers, books and magazines.
What did you think after comparing the two?
Howard Fenton is a Senior Consultant at NAPL. Howie advises commercial printers, in-plants, and manufacturers on workflow management, operations, digital services, and customer research.
Discussion
By Ron on Jun 09, 2010
While the iPad is not ideal as a content creation device it can get the job done. I have learned how to use it as my mobile computer.
By Ryan McAbee on Jun 09, 2010
Thanks for the review! Seems like you came to the same conclusion as most others in terms of the iPad being great for consumption but not creation.
Out of curiosity, how did you read on the iPad since you preferred the Kindle? The reading experience on the iPad is more flexible due to the various apps available. Reading general news through the popular Pulse app (so popular that the NYT wants it pulled) is a different experience than something like the Wired magazine app.
So the question really comes down to did you prefer the structure and simplicity of the Kindle to that of the iPad?
Thanks, Ryan
By Steve on Jun 09, 2010
Your review is right on the money. I use the exact same gadgets as you do. Also, the Kindle is great for reading books outdoors in bright sunshine (like at the beach or in my yard), because like a real book, the pages do not "wash out." I have yet to use any computer screen in direct sunlight that does as well.
By Chuck on Jun 10, 2010
The Kindle is garbage. It's five years ago. It can't be compared to the iPad. iPad is a rich experience, right out of the gate and is going to get even better. The productivity tools are quite good. Photos and movies are very good. The games are unbelievably great. Appstore baby. Oh, and by the way, you can also read a book on it. And it will come down in price-- they are selling one every three seconds according to Steve. So if Amazon wants to continue to be in the hardware business they better do something fast.
By nedm on Jun 10, 2010
"something fast"
Ipad needs security badly. If I want to play video games I'd buy a gameboy. If I want to surf the net I have a laptop. Why would a ipad be better than my kindle for reading books? eink looks better than a crt or a lcd screen.
By Victor on Jun 10, 2010
Too bad Chuck couldn't find a use for Kindle. He must be happy playing with his toy iPad. "Appstore baby. Oh, and by the way, you can also read a book on it." That is, of course, if such a strange desire ever crosses your mind. Seriously, why the 10" iPad is compared to the 6" Kindle rather than the 10" Kindle DX?
By Danny on Jun 10, 2010
I love the iPad hands down. I have been a iPhone user for several years now so typing on the iPad actually is a pleasure for me. One thing the made a big difference interesting enough is when I purchased the Apple iPad case. It wasnt my favorite based on the way it looks but folding it over and having in my lap made a world of difference.
Your article never mentioned if you had used Pages on the iPad or another content creation method? I'd say you have not gave the iPad a long enough learning curve. The iPad is not my computer replacement. When I need to use inDesign or some real graphic work I will still use my professional computer (MacBook Pro) but by all means I think Pages, Keynote and the huge mass of other Apps coming out blow any other Kindle or its like out of the water. You mentioned being able to read on the airplane better with the Kindle, have you tried reading on the airplane with the iPad? Its incredible, then when i get tired of ready flip to the next App and watch a movie in incredible rich color or flip on over to the ABC App and watch the most recent episode of Lost or if your not in the mood for Video or TV play some incredible games like Angry Birds or NBA Live.
I think the iPad is something that isnt even close to reaching the crawling stage in how and what it can be. I do agree, I'm not excited in giving AT&T more money for 3G and I think in some ways that is holding the device and Apple back.
By Danny on Jun 10, 2010
Also if you have not read the new Wired on the iPad dont even think about comparing the Kindle to the iPad. That App and media content is Amazing. Give it another chance.
By Paul on Jun 10, 2010
@Chuck
You are wrong. This is not an apt comparison; the Kindle is excellent for what it is: a reader. While the iPad has reading functionality, it is a rich experience device. The Kindle is far superior when it comes to battery life and portability; when you turn off the WiFi on the Kindle, the battery lasts for several days. The display does not strain the eyes like an active display on a laptop or iPad. If you want a device that can do everything you have to accept compromises like poor battery life, sore eyes, a large device, etc. Kindle does not have productivity tools, movies, photos, games or an app store so for you to suggest it is garbage proves that you have never used one nor do you understand what it is.
Full disclosure: I do not own an iPad or a Kindle; if I were to choose between them, I would choose the iPad. If I only needed a reader, I would choose the Kindle.
By Storm on Jun 10, 2010
Comparing the Kindle is an iPad is a joke. Not even close to being the same or similar devices. Your comment "more expensive to buy and use and frustrating to type on" is correct on one front only - more expensive to buy. How you use it (cost wise) and type on it is up to the user so it can made as easy and as cheap to use as you want.
And you missed by about a mile with your content creation remark. Tools/Apps are already available that let me do everything I currently do on a laptop. And more coming every day!
By Dianna on Jun 10, 2010
Comparing iPad to Kindle is apples to oranges, since only one is a dedicate e-reader, but I happen to agree with you - I'll keep carrying my e-reader, my laptop, and my Blackberry. They perform separate functions and do it well. The iPad does not. I have a Nook though, instead of a Kindle. Nook allows me to download free content from my local library, which gave it an edge over the Kindle in my opinion.
By Grover Daniels on Jun 10, 2010
As I post this comment, my iPad is on, directly in front of me in the dock, it is very useful as a second computer during the day. I am creating a new content paradigm, with my brain, not my words.(Luckily I did not buy the 3G model,so my email was not breached by AT&T yesterday). I do not even know where my Kindle is at the house, but I will go home and look for it. That being said, the Printing business is forever changing, and the iPad (not the Kindle) just made You Tube far more interesting, (mrgbd2 is my new You Tube Channel) and a REAL FUN way to communicate 24/7.
I would rather watch a 2-3 minute video on my iPad about something I find interesting (assuming it is not in Flash) and worthwhile. Printers take notice, we are the center of the communication universe; between Purl's, Online POD, Photo sharing sites, Email, Digital Asset Managers, templates online, and even the KINDLE App on my iPad, the world of communication, has taken a huge leap forward. My take... the Kindle is letterpress...the iPad is online digital genius.
By Howie Fenton on Jun 10, 2010
Wow ... this is some great feedback. But its my birthday today so all you folks telling me I am an old fart (the Kindle is letterpress)
and a jester (Comparing the Kindle is an iPad is a joke) have to be nice. The rule is you have to be nice today and then you can continue your flaming remarks tomorrow. To answer a few questions when I test drove the IPad i used a few different apps one was a word processor that I could open text files with and I think another read pdfs. They did not have the Kindle reader app at the Apple store.
As someone said the battery power is incredible. I have traveled cross country twice in the last 2 weeks on one battery charge. I am really surprised how much I love the small size. In does not require an thick foam sleeve like those I use on all my laptops, I can use it in those tiny regional planes even with the seats back and can slide it behind my belt in back and can carry it handsfree while wheeling my luggage on the plane.
Maybe you guys who say its an unfair comparison are right. The iPAD does much more and I am sure that watching movies or showing your pictures is an incredible experience. But as I said in a previous posting I think sometimes one tool that is designed exclusively for one use and does it very well is is better then one then two that don't work as well. I have owned every iPOD but only use the Nano over all others. I just love the smaller format even though other apple products could play my library. I have tried GPS on my Blackberry and test drove GPS on an iPhone but I prefer to carry around a Garmin Nuvi.
I am sure there are much more fun and cool things to do one an IPAD, in fact I am almost sure I will buy the next version (not a 1.0 kinda guy) but there is something to be said about doing one thing and doing it very well. Its just a simple to use, easy on the eyes reader. Again I have very specific requirements because of my traveling lifestyle. For me the current version of the iPAD is not compelling enough for me to remove something else such as my active noise reduction headphones from my exclusive set of road warrior tools. Maybe the next one will be.
Howie
By Sue on Jun 10, 2010
I have both, and I love them both, but for reading books I choose Kindle. The battery life is significantly longer than the ipad (days if you turn off the wireless) and for reading in sunlight it can't be beat. It's also lighter. I've downloaded the kindle reader for ipad so it's easy to go back and forth between devices.
By Louise on Jun 11, 2010
Thanks for the post. The ipad does seem extremley appealing, as it's a small transportable computer, and being an iphone user, I was more inclined to purchase the ipad. However I may look into the kindle reader, especially if it's better for reading books.
By Michael Jahn on Jun 11, 2010
Hi Howie. Happy Belated Birthday. I think the bit where you said you were "...not a 1.0 kinda guy" said it all. Many of us are as someone who works with developers, the KDK from Amazon is a child's toy when compared to the the SDK from Apple. I do not see much of a futures for greyscale book readers in world of color magazine, catalog or textbooks - Even if Amazon gives them away like the phone companies do with smart phones they will never significantly penetrate this space, and early adopters are not all that interested in this one trick pony.
By Bob on Jun 11, 2010
Now that I have seen the release of the new iPhone, I believe I will wait for Steve Jobs to incorporate the iPhone chip in his next iPad release. If only we could do something about the ATT limitations. 4G from Sprint & Clear may be a better alternative.
By Web to Print on Jun 11, 2010
Excellent review. The newspaper industry clearly has to make advances to newer technologies (including the web) to survive.
By Howie Fenton on Jun 11, 2010
Michael,
Thanks for the birthday wishes. I am not sure if this is the dark or light side of the social media force. But yesterday my mailbox got filled like a DDoS (denial-of-service attack) by e-cards from LinkedIn and Plaxo friends.
But more to your point, great catch on the “…not a 1.0 kinda guy”. There is much that can be said about 1.0 adopters. In brief its the pioneers that get hit by the arrows. Look at the fiasco of the security breach with the new iPAD owners.
On the other hand I'm not sure I agree that the greyscale book readers are doomed. I think it may not continue to be as popular as it once was, but I think it will evolve into a niche player in the market and continue to feed worthwhile sales to its parent company.
By Michael Schulz on Jun 12, 2010
While the iPad won't replace my laptop any time soon, it is a great travel companion and will do for basic communication. When I am out of Australia I can now just use a local prepaid micro sim and won't have to rely on overpriced access in hotels. As for reading I think we haven't seen the potential of magazines yet and books are still great on paper.
By David L. Zwang on Jun 13, 2010
For what it's worth.. I have been using my iPad in place of my Laptop while traveling for about 80- 90% of my work. Obviously I can't run CS5 on my iPad, but I have spent the last 2 months loading the needed apps to cover my needs very comfortably. And it doesn't require a lot of extra stuff to support it. I can go for 2-3 days without charging it under normal circumstances.
And when I am not traveling, I use it to read news feeds, magazines, and lots of books through both iBook and the Kindle reader apps.
By Bill Alpert on Jun 14, 2010
Interesting that this post isn't titled: Kindle vs Ipad vs Print, especially considering the readership. I have an iPad, and also have tried a Kindle. They're both great, but I still prefer reading the news on newsprint.
By Howie Fenton on Jun 15, 2010
Great feedback and thanks. It was a rainy weekend here in Denver this weekend and I went to the Apple Store in Flatirons (Again!) and sat for a few hours to test drive the iPAD again. It is a cool and impressive device I especially like the web functionality, email, e-reader, and most of all watching movies. But while I am suffering from iPAD envy - I am still going to wait to see what improvements the next version offers. But that's just one (skeptical NYer) guys opinion!
By Bob W on Jun 16, 2010
RE Bob: "I believe I will wait for Steve Jobs to incorporate the iPhone chip in his next iPad release."
The new iPhone 4 uses the A4 processor that is currently in the iPad! So, you can therefore buy an iPad right now! ;)
By Cary Sherburne on Jun 26, 2010
I am a little late joining in on this discussion. I haven't made the iPad leap yet, but I do have a Kindle. Just got back from a week's trip to Germany on planes with no power outlets. I didn't even take my power cord and my Kindle lasted the entire trip, and more. The biggest thing for me (probably because I am old enough to be Howie's grandmother!) is how easy it is on the eyes. I have also ported several PDFs over for various reasons using Amazon's free conversion service. While there are still issues with PDF conversion, it's good enough for my purposes. I will stick with my laptop and Kindle for the foreseeable future!
By John Galt on Jul 22, 2010
"I loved the iPad because of all the cool things you could look at on it. But I was frustrated when I tried to perform the work I do on my Mac laptop such as writing articles and creating slide presentations."
I know exactly what you mean: why, just this morning, I was more than a little peeved when my toaster would not wake me up, or make me a cup of coffee.
By Winston B on Jul 26, 2010
The large Kindle really appeals to me for reading newspaper content...based on what I have heard about the ease on eyes, battery charge length. I also like the idea of free access to Wikipedia on the Kindle no matter where I am...lots of nice reading there.
But my electronic magazines with their nice color pictures I guess I can view the pictures on my desktop computer and read the articles on my Kindle...why not the Ipad you might ask, well you tell me, since I really don't know, how tired do the eyes get looking at the ipad? Is it anything like reading the magazines on my desktop? I don't seem to get tired of reading off of my desktop.
So my conclusion is, I would like to have both a Kindle and an Ipad. Ipad to read my magazines and view the educational Youtube videos. A Kindle to read my newspapers and books and documents and Wikipedia.
By Sheila E Griffie on Jul 26, 2010
iPad vs. Kindle - not a fair comparison, IMHO. The Kindle is an e-reader and does that job incredibly well. It is primarily a single purpose device. The iPad is a content viewer and for those more adept, a content creator.
I don't yet own an iPad (I do own a MB Pro and an iPod Touch) but I have tried them at the Apple store and one that a friend owns. It is very likely I will get an iPad - eventually. It is very cool and will have even more apps by the time I get one. I don't plan to discard my Kindle, however.
Traveling in Europe for 5-weeks and charging my Kindle only once (and not because I needed to - just a precaution) convinced me that I will not give it away once I get the iPad. As a side note, for 10 days of that trip my teenaged grandsons were reading the same book on the Kindle (at different times). At the beach in Rimini reading the Kindle was no different than reading a book - no washout. As an e-reader, Kindle ROCKS!
In conclusion: iPad vs. Kindle - not a apt/fair comparison, in my opinion.
By Margaret on Jul 29, 2010
It seems that most of the people in this discussion are guys, which may explain why my issue with the iPad hasn't come up.
I can stick the Kindle in my purse. The iPad looks very attractive, but the size makes it just one more thing to carry. One more thing to put down somewhere. One more (expensive) thing to lose.
Since my primary desire is to have lots of books available to read wherever I go, the size of the iPad (and of the Kindle DX, incidentally) is a deal killer for me.
By Chuck on Jul 30, 2010
I was hoping someone would reopen this discussion, this is fun. Interesting stat came out this week: Apple has sold more than 3 million iPad's in the product's first three months. Analysts say it took Amazon almost 3 years to sell a similar number. Kindle is now at about 4 million sold, and say 6 million sell fewer. Of course, Amazon did pioneer this whole category of product, and the device WAS very expensive for a single purpose machine. Clearly, they are feeling the pressure and making moves to release new and less expensive hardware. But clearly, they should focus on the Kindle software, and their content catalog-- that's where they will win. The hardware onslaught is just beginning, and will be unrelenting. @Margaret- there will be many newer, better, less expensive, color multi-purpose tablet devices that will satisfy your "fit in the purse" desire. And they will be video-phones, and play music. And they'll come in pink, too!!
By Paul on Jul 31, 2010
I haven't used the Kindle, but I think you can create content on the iPad. You can use the Apple Keyboard to type with and new apps are coming out that try to fill in for Apple's lack of a file system. I opted not to get the Wi-Fi only version and passed on the 3g due to the extra expense.
I'd have to agree the Kindle would work for reading outside while the iPad would require some shade. With the iPad driving down the price of the Kindle, it might be worthwhile to purchase at some point.
Went to the Apple store the other day and it was packed with people looking at the iPad. With such a large consumer base, hopefully Apple will add a system for organizing files to its OS rather than just dumping everything together or making apps figure it out.
I plan to use the iPad as a remote control for my audio and visual too. It's supplanted my iPod Touch which I still carry around with me for calendering when I'm traveling light. Once again I don't feel compelled to switch to iPhone due to the AT&T monopoly/expense.
Another significant issue is that Apple seems to be ratcheting up the OS with the release of the new iPhone OS. They're preventing people from back grading their installed OS which means you have to be more tech savy to find a work around on a device that's supposed to be user friendly or you end up with a non-functional piece of electronics. In short this means you have a small window in which your device is current/functioning. No wonder batteries on Apple mobile devices aren't user serviceable and Apple is emphasizing how easy it is to recycle your old Apple devices so you won't feel guilty just throwing them away when you buy next year's model.
I don't see these disposable/latest/greatest trends with the Kindle.
As far a business use, the trip to the Apple store was very revealing. They had a guy in his early 20s for their business specialist who seemed to have a very shallow knowledge base. The genius bar at the store didn't provide Snow Leopard server support nor did they have it running on any of the computers in the store nor was there an open Mac Mini Server on display. It seems that as more PC based touch screen devices come out, they'll be more business oriented and may become the devices to replace your laptop and provide the functionality of the Kindle for business travelers.
By Donna on Aug 02, 2010
I've researched both the Kindle and iPad and have decided to buy the new Kindle 3. I have an iPhone 3GS and love it and I am able to read books on it but of course the screen is way to small.
I've decided to travel with the Kindle and my uniportable laptop for now. Both of these items along with my iPhone will serve my needs. I read about 2 books a week and the eInk on the Kindle is easier on my "aging" eyes.
I am waiting for the next generation of iPad to come out before I purchase it and then may leave my laptop at home while traveling.
By Marla Heller on Aug 05, 2010
If you want to read books, the Kindle seems like a better choice today. The Amazon bookstore makes it easy to search and find books, whereas, the iBookstore is run like a speakeasy. (You can only get in, if you already have the app. And unless it's a bestseller, you need to already know what you want.)
By Winston B on Aug 13, 2010
I keep forgetting the main reason I want to buy a Kindle and that is the ease with which you can look up words in the kindle dictionary while reading a book; a great way to build ones vocabulary. With a kindle my teenage daughter can build her vocab easily. It would be nice if the kindle dictionary allowed one to keep a log of the words one has looked up and the sentences they were found in or a quick return to the page in the book where you encountered the word. Definitely buy a kindle for your kids.
By Shep on Aug 21, 2010
I own a Kindle and an iPad. Anyone want to buy a Kindle? Mine's been sitting in the drawer since the iPad came out. The iPad is a better platform on all fronts, IMO. I also have a netbook collecting dust! I love this iPad device!
By Terry Proveau on Aug 24, 2010
I am a pc system builder and do repair service as well. I bought a 16 gig wifi iPad a month ago. I find I rarely turn on my laptop any more. I love the iPad. It is my first apple product. Yes it has some shortfalls (flash) but it is a slickly built device. Updates are very fast. It's just so convenient I probably could not do without one now. And get this!!! My wife said to me a couple days ago that she would be very glad to take it off my hands when a next generation iPad comes out that I want! I was not expecting that! The kindle or any e book reader is lighter and easier to read in sunlight but I mostly read in bed and the iPad works better here, being backlit. I turn the brightness down all the way and it is perfect for reading in a dark room and does not disturb my wife when the brightness is low. I am actually using the iPad to type this note and it works great for me, a two finger typist. The iPad also supports several book reading softwares, so there is a lot more choice. I have downloaded more free books than I can likely read in the next 10 years! Ipad is a bit pricey however I doubt anyone will ever catch up to Apple with the quality experience on the iPad. The capacitive screen looks incredible as well.
By Tony on Aug 24, 2010
What about the voice reading ability of the Kindle....Does the Ipad have that capibilty? Apple had apps that could read text more than 20 years ago when I owned my first Mac.
By Heath on Aug 25, 2010
I have an iPad, and I purchase and read Kindle books exclusively via the Kindle App which is great. It has more features than the Kindle itself. I also have the choice of using the Nook, or Apple bookstores to purchase and read books.
Choice matters. Kindle or Nook lock you into one supplier.
By Howie Fenton on Aug 25, 2010
There is no question that if your in the market for just a e-reader, the choices are many and the decision is tough. For me I wanted 3G wireless so I could download books and newspapers when I get stuck on a airport tarmac. Also I wanted to be able to put my own documents on it, so I would not have to carry around tons of paper, which meant converting MS Word and Powerpoint presentations to pdfs. And another thing I considered is who would most likely still have a product in 5 years. I would not want my e-reader to join the rest of my computer junkyard pile which is filled with SyQuest and Bernoulli drives. Based on those considerations I went with the Kindle.
By Rich H on Aug 25, 2010
i'm an iPad owner. I never wanted the Kindle do to the fact I don't read a terrible lot. The stuff I do read, I use the Kindle app on the iPad - which, by the way, is GREAT. Kindle is a great device if you are an avid reader (which is why I've purchased them for family members.
My iPad replaces my laptop somewhere between 90-95% of the time. There are definitely things the iPad cannot do well compared to a laptop, and most have already been brought out here. But, for what I bought it for - which is internet use and photo storage (I'm an amateur photographer), it works superbly.
Both are great devices, and I love my iPad
By Chuck on Aug 29, 2010
I just have to say that spending millions on TV commercials promoting the "reading outside" benefit of the Kindle is starting to seem really weak to me.
What's Amazon's strategy for the coming fall and winter? How about, "looks better under Xmas tree lights"? That's about how dumb the direct sunlight argument is. I can see reading a number of the posts here that this idea has achieved some traction with people, but I can also say that I've been to the pool and beach a bunch of times this summer and have see few or no e-readers and lots of paperbacks and magazines (they both do still exist!) I also read a terrific article about Barnes & Noble in New York Magazine this week, August 30th issue page 34, in which the statistic is referenced that most book buyers "buy fewer than 5 books a year and don't need a $100-plus device to help them consume a $5 paperback." I think this becomes one of the most powerful ideas behind the iPad winning-- because it is a multi-purpose device, the higher cost of which is very nicely justified by all the wonderful things it does in addition to providing reading.
So I hope Amazon has something more powerful and creative waiting in the wings. Like a partnership with Apple or something ;-)
By Howie Fenton on Aug 29, 2010
Chuck,
I am not sure of Amazon’s strategy for the coming fall, all I can report is that there are some people who monitor the online "want ads" posted by Amazon and they are speculating from those ads that Amazon is in development of a new e-reader type product.
But I have been in San Fransisco and Silicon Valley this week and everywhere I look are billboards for the iPad. Clearly Apple is spending a ton on cross media advertising and it looks like it is working.
Howie
Discussion
Only verified members can comment.