It stood out in the shipment of direct mail that accumulated during last week's road trip, a glossy, over-sized postcard touting the power of personalized URLs. It was digitally printed, used first-name personalization in the copy on the address side, had a PURL, and a postal bar code. But there were things wrong with the card. My name, for example, was nowhere to be found. Someone else's name and company was, though, along with a PURL containing his name. But my street, city, state and zip were correct. Hmmm.
So I revved up Firefox and plugged in the PURL to find the initial landing page largely an opportunity to correct my "information," which amounts to the name and company name--not the address. Clicking deeper I quickly got to a sales pitch and an opportunity to spend money, but little about what a PURL is, how it works, how I can use it, what it can do for my business, or anything. The "thank you" page at the end was also not personalized.
Since my address was used, I suspected a purchased list. So I modified the PURL to use my name and arrived at a different landing page asking me some questions and a link to an offer. Next, I called a colleague who seems to be on many of the same lists as I to see if he had also gotten a postcard. He had, with the same errors. Then I substituted the names of some other industry colleagues which brought me to their landing pages and the same links. Checking further, I plugged in the names of friends outside the printing industry. Those got me to the sending company's home page, not a personalized one. So it really was a live list that was either wrong to begin with or something went south during document composition or printing, and at least a portion of the cards went out due to inadequate quality control. This stuff happens. Been there, done that, having learned the hard way about this kind of error about 20 years ago.
But while I have professional curiosity, would the average recipient bother to even look at a card addressed to someone else, much less plug in the PURL? Probably not. So much for effective cross-media marketing.
The bigger problem here is not just that the mailing went wrong, but that a (possibly substantial) portion of the intended audience was marketers who just might be interested in using PURLs for their next direct marketing program. And if they get a mailing from a company offering its services for cross-media campaigns, but which has visible errors in its own direct marketing program, it doesn't exactly inspire confidence in how well they will handle a program for its customers.
The point is that if you are going to offer new technology, be sure you can make it work before you roll it out to the market. Whether you choose to buy the software or use an ASP model, learn how to use the tools or services involved, how to implement the appropriate levels of quality control, and make the offer one that engages the recipient, not simply offers a supposedly great deal. It's still Marketing 101: People buy what products do, and with technology products and services most prospects out there still need some education along with the offer.
Discussion
By Michael Josefowic z on Jul 17, 2007
Great story. Just goes to show that technology is not the answer. Maybe one way to help is to look at every exchange from the "customer's" point of view. A little time spent trying it out would have revealed most of these problems. BEFORE they spent all the money and time implementing the technology.
By Paul Galligan on Jul 17, 2007
While it is unfortunate that you were the recipient of a bad mail piece (God knows I've gotten thousands), it is important to look at the source. There are many new-to-digital companies popping up all over the country, some of whom outsource every aspect of their work, and others that haven't figured out all the issues that go with data-driven technology. These companies are bad for the consumer as well as bad for the industry.
Companies that are unaccustomed to dealing with data-driven technology can leave a bad taste for consumers and drive response rates down. Many would look at the "mixup" that you received and simply throw the piece away, not even looking at the offer. You were intrigued by the PURL and wanted to know more, which is the only reason it was saved from the circular file. I wonder how that piece ever made it in the mail in the first place. It should have never left the digital operations area. This is one reason that the digital print market is only due to increase 3% this year. Fear. High volume digital print marketers such as financial companies, banks, and insurance companies now have a lot of legislation that they must comply with, and a mix-up with data just can't be tolerated.
When response rates fall, agencies and market savvy advertisers feel that this type of response mechanism doesn't work, when in fact, pURL technology can increase response rates by 30% or more! It is important to deal with a reputable company which has staff that has been dealing with digital technology for more than a few years. I mention that staff needs to be well informed, because it's not only important that a company has been in the digital field for a fair amount of time, but that they have the knowledge base within the company to make the technology work correctly. When technology doesn't work correctly because of human error and little oversight, it hurts our industry. Some are scared that a company will "mix up" their data just like in your article "When Direct Mail and PURLs Don’t Work". It sounds like someone sorted an Excel file without selecting all the fields, just the name and company field. Without proper QC procedures, like the rigorous ones we utilize at Cohber, print buyers and marketing executives will remain skeptical, and our industry will suffer because someone's taking a short-cut. PURLs are extremely effective, if executed properly. We recently received a 58% response rate to one of our campaigns. Most people are happy with a 1%-3% response rate. Not only was our campaign effective, but we have the ability to capture information about the recipients that we otherwise wouldn't know. We do this by including a survey and asking relevant questions to pinpoint our recipients needs. Also, the rules of list brokerage say that if someone responds to your offer or campaign, you have the right to pursue that person as much as possible. If you are using a purchased list, everyone that hits the PURL is a respondent and you now own their name and other information you gather. You no longer are limited to a one-time-use for purchased lists.
There are many reasons to utilize the many different type of digital technology. There are also many technologies to consider when creating a campaign, such as Image Development, PURLs, variable email blasts, and robust document document composition that allows you to create high level logic. Using a ruputable, knowledgeable company is the first step.
By Jay LeSaicherre on Jul 17, 2007
Does this sound familiar?
By Jay LeSaicherre on Jul 17, 2007
See, this happens to other print/mailers.
By Michael Jahn on Jul 17, 2007
If one is going to invest the time effort (and money!) to do anything involving a database, indeed, be sure to clean it up before trying to use it. Even taking the time to stumble through exporting the database to an Excel spread sheet, build a simple template in Word, run a mail merge and inspect - this cost nothing but time and can save you thousands (never mind the embarrassment!) I would add that this must have worked at some level (curiosity quotient?) as you clearly spent some time researching 'what went wrong'!
By Noel Ward on Jul 17, 2007
Paul Galligan:
Don't read too much into the fact that I took the time to research the PURL. Because I follow this industry for a living I dug deeper to see what the sending company was doing. The average recipient of a mis-addressed piece will probably not do that.
I'd love to hear more about the campaign on which you saw a 58% response. We all need to see more of those to jump start some of this stuff!
Thanks for your note.
By John Henry on Jul 17, 2007
My take on this the whole PURL thing, it is way over hyped and over charged.
This is not black magic; it is a software solution on web server. Soon it will be a built in web server like script and it will not cost you any extra. The days of $5000 cost and yearly fees will soon be over. When that occurs the purls will be another tool and no longer the "hot thing"
The fun thing is just like many other hot things they will tell you "hard" it is to do. Then someone blows the lid of like fusion pro with VDP.
The selling, message, the data base and imaging are the real tricks. The ones who apply it to the correct jobs will find it works well. Just adding a purl is no magic bullet to higher response rates.
By Erik W. Charles on Jul 17, 2007
Noel Ward makes some excellent points regarding how a personalized campaign can fail if not properly run. If a direct mail campaign arrives on the doorstep made out to “occupant,” it might be read or thrown away. If it arrives with the wrong name, then the sender has damaged their own reputation (“They can’t get this right, so who knows what else they mess up in their business”). This can be further magnified if other levels of personalization in the campaign continue to remind the recipient of the mistakes made by the sender (e.g. a PURL with the wrong name).
PURLS offer a higher degree of personalization. Targeted promotions based on effective customer segmentation have been proven to be more effective (see “Consumer heterogeneity in the longer-term effects of price promotions”, http://web.merage.uci.edu/~currim/Currim 2.pdf). At the same time, MISS-targeted promotions can make your promotion a joke and backfire on you.
When technology offers more ability to the user, it MUST be accompanied with training. You don’t want to just jump into PURLs without understanding both the benefits and the now apparent risks. Simply jumping into a system without thinking through all of the abilities is akin to when Apple gave EVERYONE the ability to easily put multiple fonts into one sentence, regardless of readability.
Once you get the address and name correct, you need to make sure that the landing page continues to be a powerful part of your promotion campaign. Put some content up that is targeted at the recipient. Make it a worthwhile stop on their path to being a customer, not just a way to get more contact information.
By John Roberds on Jul 17, 2007
Noel,
Great post. Some questions. You said you logged on as yourself and as some other people. How was the purl actually personalized? Did you see something different with the different log ons? From your description it sounded like you saw the same information with each logon.
I don't know a lot about purls so maybe my questions don't make sense but it would seem to me that if something is represented as personalized different people would be treated differently.
By Rick Gagner on Jul 17, 2007
Noel, I can't believe how badly the campaign was screwed up. Perhaps the area of most concern to me is the use of a purchased list for a "personalized" campaign. That just smacks of spam and discredits the whole industry who are all trying hard to attract and engage DM recipients, many with good offers, data and creative. Furthermore, if you don't know anything about your customer or prospect, beginning with name and address (Hello!?), why attempt to use a direct mail response device that is unintended for this purpose. Our company, Agile Media, is one of those digital companies that Paul Galligan refers to. Yes, we own a digital press (I make no apology). Yes, we were once new to data-driven direct marketing. But, unlike a printer, we've taken time to understand the DM industry and how and when PURLs make sense. In fact, if you check out a recent post in our blog, Personally Speaking, http://www.agilemedia.com/blog/2007/07/03/gt-launch-campaign-for-click2print, you'll see results for a campaign we did for Grand & Toy that yielded a 44.3% response and a 25.5% conversion. Those are for-real numbers! Yes, there is a place for the use of PURLS. However, as in any marketing initiative, it takes wisdom and experience to know when and how to deploy them.
By Nolin on Jul 19, 2007
Or maybe this was a well-engineered plan to have you validate your contact information, leveraging the fact that people are innately annoyed by seeing inaccurate information and can rarely resist the urge to correct it. Purposely substituting a random name for your correct name would be enough to spur most people into updating, which would likely also result in the opportunity to collect new info like a phone number or email address.
Just food for thought...
By Bill McMillan on Jul 20, 2007
Although the technology is "new", basic quality control hasn't really changed. How many times are you supposed to measure before you cut?