Log In | Become a Member | Contact Us


Leading printing executives into the future

Connect on Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

Commentary & Analysis

Printing Trade Show Postponement Is Said to Provoke “Kiwi Outrage”

By Patrick Henry
Published: March 4, 2010

The U.S. isn’t the only country where some soul-searching—and some hand-wringing—is being done about the future of graphic arts trade shows.

Print21online, an online journal for the printing industry in Australia and New Zealand, reports “Kiwi outrage” over the postponement of Printech, New Zealand’s quadrennial printing trade show, from 2010 to 2012 “due to a lack of support from both sponsors and the industry.”

XPO Exhibitions, owner of the Printech event, recently announced that the decision was made in order to give the show more time to deliver on “the new promise” of a reorganized approach that will emphasize the benefits of print to print buyers and marketers. It claims to have received written commitments to a postponed event from “several large key suppliers.”

According to Print21online, this explanation was echoed in a member newsletter published by PrintNZ, an industry trade association. But the story also quotes Joan Grace, president of PrintNZ, as saying that “there were signs that the show’s future looked shaky for some time” and that “XPO was not able to get the commitments needed to go ahead with a show this year.”

The fact that 2012 is a drupa year could cause “some difficulties” for Printech if it takes place then, Grace also observed.

The story characterizes Kevin Trye, a print industry consultant, as being “irate” at the news. In his blog, Trye asserts that the postponement is because “none of the major sponsors being Heidelberg, Agfa, Xerox, Canon, etc. were willing to front up.” He also claims that PrintNZ “actively campaigned” against the show and that “without PrintNZ blessing, Printech 2010 never had a chance.”

Says Trye, “It will be printers and the local industry that will suffer as a result. Millions in lost revenue and new business.”

“We’re lucky this fiasco happened in little NZ. Elsewhere, it could have ended up in the courts. It might still,” he muses.

Patrick Henry, Executive Editor for WhatTheyThink.com is also the director of Liberty or Death Communications, a consultancy specializing in research, education, promotional, and editorial support services for the printing and publishing industries.

Patrick Henry is available for speaking engagements and consulting projects. To get more information contact us here.

Please offer your feedback to Patrick. He can be reached at patrick.henry@whattheythink.com.

 

Post a Comment

To post a comment Log In or Become a Member, doing so is simple and free

 

WhatTheyThink Full Disclosure Statement: Our editors work with several companies within the industry and may have ongoing projects or discussions with companies named in articles. These companies play no role in the direction of these articles. The views expressed by our contributing writers are their own and may not reflect those of WhatTheyThink.com. WhatTheyThink.com may have formal business dealings with companies named in Premium Access articles. However, these relationships play no role in the editorial content at this site. See our complete editorial policy by clicking here.

Popular Stories from Last Week

(10) Kodak, Does it Have a Future?
(9) Kodak Files for Bankruptcy Protection
(8) manroland to be divided into 3 units
(7) Blackstreet Capital Affiliate Purchases AlphaGraphics
(6) Eight Xerox iGen4 EXP Presses Purchased by Standard Register
(5) Handwriting: It's Not Just for Humans Anymore
(4) Will Newspapers Ever Use Digital Printing?
(3) Latex Ink Jet Technology Goes Mainstream
(2) RR Donnelley Agreement With Metro Inc
(1) Research Shows Americans Still Prefer Print and Paper

Become a Member

Join the thousands of printing executives who are already part of the WhatTheyThink Community.

Copyright © 2012 WhatTheyThink. All Rights Reserved