WhatTheyThink

Premium Commentary & Analysis

The Three-Letter Problem!

Why are so many companies in the print industry choosing three-initial names that prove completely indistinguishable from the next three-initial name. Whether it’s ABC or XYZ, Andy Tribute tries to sort out the confusion.

Tuesday, November 09, 2010

Have you noticed just how many companies in this industry now go under names made up of just three initials? At the recent GraphExpo I counted forty-four such companies exhibiting. I had a quick look at the drupa catalog of exhibitors for 2008 and there were certainly a great deal more than forty-four such companies whose names were made up of just three initials. I think that this is generating a real problem in giving companies an identity that differentiates them from other companies.

Let me quote an example of a discussion I had with a leading UK direct mail printer this week. We were discussing the operation of their business and I was told that three of their key suppliers were CMC, GMC and GMG. I’m supposed to be an expert, but I have to admit that while I’m familiar with of these companies, I could not exactly recall what each of them. I could pretend to be like Frank Romano and have a question for everyone. That would tell me which of these companies is the enterprise software company, which is the color proofing company and which is the finishing equipment company. Unlike Frank though, I am not offering prizes! I have to say it is lucky they were not getting their ink from XSYS , which is owned by CVC.

What is my gripe about three letter initial companies? Well, it is just that there are too many of them for their names to have any real meaning. Many years ago a three-letter company was unusual, like back in the days of dedicated word processor suppliers when one of the market leaders was NBI. This was unique and we all asked what NBI stood for and we were told it was “Nothing But Initials.” In those times there were few three-letter companies and the few included computer companies IBM and ICL. Today there are so many of these companies that it is difficult to remember them, and definitely to associate each set of initials with what the company does. Some do stand out, like EFI. I know that EFI stands for Electronics for Imaging, but those of us who have been around for some time know it really stands for Efi, and it was named after its founder, the industry visionary Efi Arazi. However for most of these companies I really have no idea what they stand for. Just one example of how confusing this can be, I have just looked at a page in the drupa catalog and find GMA, GMC, GMG and GMP. That means there is still opportunity for twenty-two other companies in this industry to use the initials GM in their three-letter name. It is lucky General Motors does not make printing equipment.


Continue reading your article
with a WhatTheyThink membership.

WhatTheyThink Annual Membership

Less than $4/week.

Get unlimited access to in-depth commentary and analysis covering the latest trends, emerging technologies, operational strategies, and key events across every segment of today's printing industry.

Stay informed. Stay competitive. Stay ahead.
WhatTheyThink Day Pass

$5 for 24 hours

Unlimited access to all of WhatTheyThink. Get your Day Pass

Already a member?
Sign In

About Andrew Tribute

Recent Articles from Andrew Tribute

Andy Tribute on Ipex

Andy Tribute on Ipex

Andy Tribute joins us from retirement to discuss Ipex, his local industry trade show. He discusses the challenges faced by Informa and how they transformed the event from a product driven show to a content-based show. Read More

Landa Nanographic Printing – A New Approach for Printing?

Andy Tribute reviews the nanography printing process and where Landa is with commercial availability of its Nanographic presses. How the claimed advantages of Nanographic presses compare to modern sheetfed offset and liquid toner technology and inkjet systems from Canon/Océ, Xeikon and Konica Minolta. Read More

IPEX 2014 Review

The Ipex 2014 event in London was not one for major product introductions. The size of the event was much smaller than originally planned due to the withdrawal of many of the major suppliers. Highlights include Konica Minolta, FFEI, LumeJet, Scodix, Riso and others. Read More

IPEX – A New Approach for Trade Shows

Ipex 2014, which moved from Birmingham to London, was anticipated to be the key event for availability of the raft of new digital presses announced at drupa 2012. Unfortunately Ipex was hit with two major difficulties. First the printing industry did not appear to be recovering from the recession, and second almost none of the new products announced at drupa were going to be ready for release by March 2014. Read More

Offset – Technology for the Future of USA’s Printing!

Please excuse this article coming after my retirement last year and my statement that you had seen my last article. I am taking the opportunity given to me by Randy Davidson to write the occasional guest editorial if I see a subject that I feel needs my own ‘unique’ take. Read More