WhatTheyThink

Premium Commentary & Analysis

MacIntel: How Cool Is That

August 17 ,

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

August 17 , 2005 -- Last month, one of the great innovators of our time rekindled our imagination as only he can do. At Apple's WorldWide Developers Conference in San Francisco, Steve Jobs previewed a version of the OS X 'Tiger' operating system running native on an Intel-based Mac to over 3600 developers in attendance. Two weeks earlier, magazines and newspapers reported that Intel and Apple might join forces. Most of us rationalized the report as an Apple positioning statement prior to negotiations with IBM, or just the routine grinding of the rumor mill. We laughed at Steve's showmanship and went on about our business. Now that the truth is made public, we are left with many questions. How should we feel? Some are unperturbed by the switch; if the builder of my speedboat decides to use a faster engine, what do I care -- as long as it makes the boat faster and the manufacturer promises support? However, in discussions with customers and industry pundits, I've learned that some folk feel unsettled, and others feel hoodwinked. For years, we have seen Mr. Jobs on stage providing foil after foil of benchmark data illustrating the superiority of the PowerPC processor over Intel products. Are we to believe that Intel suddenly leap-frogged IBM and AMD to become Apple's preferred performance platform? Clearly, the demo at the WWDC was the end result of years of parallel development; engineers have been working on this for a very long time. And all this time Steve Jobs was telling us the PowerPC-based platform was "the fastest computer on the planet". Will this comprise the credibility of our iGuru? Anyone who knows the computer industry will tell you that benchmarks hang from the same family tree as statistics Personally, I'm not bothered by marketing babble; I consider the move courageous. Yes; there is the documented history of benchmark data, but anyone who knows the computer industry will tell you that benchmarks hang from the same family tree as statistics and, as we learned from Mark Twain, there are "lies, damn lies, and statistics." I think it bold and totally unexpected that Apple would take a clinical look at the technology roadmaps of the Big Three [chip makers] and choose Intel. Regardless of the backlash, the move is in the best interest of Apple customers. What should we do now? We are told it will be 2006 before we see the Intel CPU in MiniMacs and PowerBooks (because of thermal issues with the PowerPC, these SKUs will see Intel technology first), and 2007 before the technology will reside in our workstations and servers. Surely, the company realizes that many potential buyers will now wait until Intel is Inside to purchase a new machine, thereby driving short-term sales through the floor. Apparently, they are willing to lose short-term sales revenue to satisfy the best interests of their customer base (another reason I think the move 'courageous'). I've seen the Intel-based development platform; if you think the dual G5 was the fastest workstation on Earth, you're in for a wonderful surprise. I am willing to wait until I can buy MacIntel. If you think the dual G5 was the fastest workstation on Earth, you're in for a wonderful surprise. Apple's justification for making the announcement now is that it will take time for the developers to port their code to the new platform. (To "port" code is to move a program from one type of computer to another. One needs to rewrite sections that are machine dependent, and then recompile the program on the new computer.) Some applications will take more time to port than others; new software developed using Xcode should be ready soon, as they will require only a single port. However, more mature applications were developed using tools that would require the software to (a) be tested on Rosetta, a PowerPC-to-Intel emulator or (b) ported first to Xcode and then again for the MacIntel machine. If you contact your software manufacture, they will be able to tell you when their product will be ready for the latest and greatest from Apple. That's right: MacIntel will prove to be one of the greatest things to ever happen to Apple customers. How cool is that?


Continue reading your article
with a WhatTheyThink membership.

WhatTheyThink Annual Membership

Less than $4/week.

Get unlimited access to in-depth commentary and analysis covering the latest trends, emerging technologies, operational strategies, and key events across every segment of today's printing industry.

Stay informed. Stay competitive. Stay ahead.
WhatTheyThink Day Pass

$5 for 24 hours

Unlimited access to all of WhatTheyThink. Get your Day Pass

Already a member?
Sign In

About WhatTheyThink

WhatTheyThink is the global printing industry's go-to information source with both print and digital offerings, including WhatTheyThink.com, WhatTheyThink Email Newsletters, and the WhatTheyThink magazine. Our mission is to inform, educate, and inspire the industry. We provide cogent news and analysis about trends, technologies, operations, and events in all the markets that comprise today's printing and sign industries including commercial, in-plant, mailing, finishing, sign, display, textile, industrial, finishing, labels, packaging, marketing technology, software and workflow.

Recent Articles from WhatTheyThink

The Total Label Issue

The Total Label Issue

This issue of the WhatTheyThink Quarterly is all about labels, which are seen as a high-growth part of commercial printing, driven by e-commerce, food/beverage demand, and regulations. The market has surpassed 1.2 trillion square meters of label production volume per year, and is moving toward high-mix, low-waste production rather than only high-volume throughput. While flexo is still used for high-volume label production, digital label printing often complements it—or in some cases replaces it. But labels are about more than printing technology. Read More

The Unified Platform for Packaging Manufacturing Excellence

The Unified Platform for Packaging Manufacturing Excellence

Leverage 30+ years of plant-floor expertise. Trusted by 700+ packaging manufacturers globally to reduce waste, optimize scheduling, and drive digital transformation. One unified foundation. Eight packaging-native pillars. Zero fragmentation. Read More

Expand Your Opportunities with the Truepress JET 560HDX from SCREEN

Expand Your Opportunities with the Truepress JET 560HDX from SCREEN

Commercial, direct mail, and publishing printers accustomed to producing jobs over several weeks can now print them in days with the SCREEN Truepress JET 560HDX. The press can accommodate 120 lb. coated or uncoated paper up to 560 mm wide. Read More

Around the Web: Of Water and Winners

Around the Web: Of Water and Winners

A sign-writer created the visual style of music festivals. The “2026 Milky Way Photographer of the Year” winners. AI appears to be catching on among the Amish. Sony has upgraded its wearable air conditioner. How to easily reuse produce bags. A complex digital water clock. A Nobel Prize–winning technology is able to extract water from dry air. Yes, it is possible to be allergic to water. Laser-induced graphene on Kevlar enables multifunctional structural composites. The “most desired” place in each of the 50 states. “The rise in plastic surgeons asked to create ‘AI face.’” K-pop band BTS has teamed with Oreo to release limited edition OREO x BTS Cookies. Welcome to WhatTheyThink’s weekly miscellany. Read More

Graphic Arts Employment in April Down Overall—Substantially Among Non-Production

Graphic Arts Employment in April Down Overall—Substantially Among Non-Production

April 2026 saw printing industry employment overall generally flat, down 0.4% from March. And while production employment was up 0.6%, non-production employment was down by 2.5%—basically the reverse of what we saw in March. Read More

Recent Printing Industry News

Wednesday, June 03, 2026