Log In | Become a Member | Contact Us

Market Intelligence for Printing and Publishing

Connect on Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn

Featured:   COVID-19 Coverage   Printing Outlook 2020   WhatTheyThink Magazine     Production Inkjet     Installations and Placements

Commentary & Analysis

Kodak Means to Stay the Course in Graphic Communications Throughout Chapter 11 Reorganization

Kodak will continue to advance its graphic communications business as it tries to emerge from bankruptcy, treating its digital printing, plate, and workflow operations as keys to survival and future success.

By Patrick Henry
Published: January 20, 2012

Exclusive VideoKodak President & COO Phil Faraci on Recent Bankruptcy Announcement

Kodak will continue to advance its graphic communications business as it tries to emerge from bankruptcy, treating its digital printing, plate, and workflow operations as keys to survival and future success.

This was the essence of the message from Chris Payne, Kodak’s vice president – marketing, business to business, in conversations with journalists following the announcement that the 132-year old company had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. That move, Payne said, will not diminish Kodak’s commitment to its graphic communications customers or impact its ability to serve them.

According to Payne, graphic communications emphatically is among “the most valuable business lines” that Phil Faraci, Kodak’s president and COO, said the company would focus upon in his video briefing on the bankruptcy filing. The graphic communications segments, echoed Payne, are seen as the “key pillars” of Kodak’s plan for recovery.

As part of an organizational restructuring announced by Kodak prior to the bankruptcy declaration, the Graphic Communications Group (GCG) will combine with two other product lines (Entertainment Imaging and Commercial Film) in a newly created Commercial Segment. But, said Payne, apart from a few executive appointments connected with the restructuring, GCG customers should experience no changes in their everyday business relationships with Kodak.

Like Faraci, Payne stressed that the bankruptcy filing does not mean that Kodak has gone out of business or anticipates doing so. Large companies in other industries have emerged in stronger, more competitive shape with the help of Chapter 11 protection, Payne said.

Kodak expects to complete its reorganization under Chapter 11 sometime in 2013, he added. The company, which has obtained a $950 million line of credit from Citigroup, believes that it will have enough liquidity to operate normally during the Chapter 11 period.

Given that they represent “the future of the company,” said Payne, Kodak’s graphic communications product lines—including its toner and inkjet digital printing systems—won’t suffer in terms of R&D investment as reorganization proceeds. He also explained that Kodak’s plan to raise cash through the sale of patents and intellectual property won’t affect the evolution of these products.

The intellectual property that Kodak intends to sell, Payne said, is entirely on the consumer products side and represents only about 10% of the company’s business. In contrast to this, said Payne, “we will continue to focus on building our patent portfolio in the GCG.”

That portfolio will be on display at drupa 2012, where Kodak intends to exhibit without any change in plans stemming from the bankruptcy filing. “We will be there in full force,” Payne said.

Speaking today from GUA 2012, Kodak’s user group conference in New Orleans, Payne noted that Kodak customers were taking the bankruptcy announcement in stride. “Our customers are highly supportive, and they see that we have a future in this business,” he said.

Their aplomb may arise in part from being conditioned by a recent drumbeat of similar news about other industry-leading companies, such as the breakup of manroland and the sale of AlphaGraphics. “People are generically fairly used to ongoing consolidation activities of this kind,” Payne said.


It’s remarkable that reports in the general media—including the numerous stories putting a gratuitous, how-the-mighty-have-fallen spin on the travails of Kodak—have had almost nothing to say about the condition or even the existence of its graphic communications product lines. In fairness, these B-to-B verticals seldom attract much attention beyond the confines the industry to which they’re exclusively marketed. But, the days of graphic communications as Kodak’s best-kept secret probably are over, and this may be the one bright bit of news to emerge from its otherwise sobering Chapter 11 announcement.

Now that they have been identified as the keys to the future that Kodak hopes to secure, the company’s graphic production solutions should begin to receive the full measure of recognition they deserve from professional users, media observers, and shareholders alike. Thanks to its portfolio of Trillian digital plates, NexPress toner presses, Prosper and Versamark inkjet systems, and Prinergy workflows, the newly created Commercial Segment remains 100% competitive, technologically speaking, with any other vendor in the production printing marketplace. As these products come to the fore as the hallmarks of the Kodak brand, we think that the new company rising in Rochester will prove to be an even more compelling subject for journalists both inside and outside the industry to cover.

Patrick Henry, Executive Editor for WhatTheyThink.com is also the director of Liberty or Death Communications, a consultancy specializing in research, education, promotional, and editorial support services for the printing and publishing industries.

Patrick Henry is available for speaking engagements and consulting projects. To get more information contact us here.

Please offer your feedback to Patrick. He can be reached at patrick.henry@whattheythink.com.



By Stuart Walker on Jan 20, 2012

I have a hard time taking this author seriously after reading the Commentary.


By Kevin Cushing on Jan 20, 2012

Best of luck to the Kodak team for a successful restructuring.

To be clear, Alphagraphics Inc. has been profitable and solvent for many years. Its shares were recently purchased by an affiliate of Maryland-based private equity fund Blackstreet Capital Partners II.

Kevin Cushing, CEO, Alphagraphics, Inc.


By Clint Bolte on Jan 23, 2012

Any time a company expects to cash in on its portfolio of patents either in terms of royalty revenue streams or a supposed capital multiple for selling the company I reflect upon the reality of the Patent system in both the United States and the world.

One of the most powerful and effective PACs in existence is that of the Patent Attorneys. Their position is simple and straight forward. All patents are now comprised of technologies that are much too complex for the US Patent office to understand or to waste their time in trying to figure out. Hence, the wisest use of tax payers' money is to reduce the budget and staff of the US Patent Office, issue requested patents faster than ever, and let the real Patent Experts (Patent attorneys) decide the worthiness of patents in the Judicial process.

Hence the only patents being defended are owned by huge corporations with deep pockets to afford Patent Attorneys and the years required to resolve the disputes. For those companies of every size who hold patents it is increasingly difficult to collect patent royalties or to pursue infringements. This is another repurcussion of the fall off of the economy and broken business model now illustrated by the US Patent Office and the patent system.


By Ron Tussy on Jul 27, 2012

Clint, I am an technology IP expert / consultant / expert witness within this industry for numerous years and deal with the USPTO and ITC daily. I couldn't disagree with your assertions more. I believe both the USPTO and ITC are both grossly underfunded comnpared with the rest of the world and in order for the US to keep any competitive IP advantage and development and maintain future IP, this country needs to strengthen the USPTO and protect our home grown IP against pirates from emerging countries and nationalistic tendencies emerging from other countries patent offices. Because of this groww underfunding, other countries are starting to disregard the validity of US based patents, partly due to the massive troll activity in the US. Proof of domestic industry needs to be enforced within both entities to keep the trolls and their attorneys from manipulating our IP system.


Post a Comment

To post a comment Log In or Become a Member, doing so is simple and free


Become a Member

Join the thousands of printing executives who are already part of the WhatTheyThink Community.

Copyright © 2020 WhatTheyThink. All Rights Reserved